A Life Without Flowers: Toxic Ambivalence, Travellers’ Ways, and Insalubrious Attachments in an Urban Travellers’ Camp

Travellers’ toxic attachments correspond to the literature on ‘toxic ambivalence’, particularly how pollution can be both constraining and enabling. Although toxic ambivalence theorists provide more nuanced engagements with toxicity than previous anthropological approaches, they still privilege how toxicity constrains participants’ lives – which are shaped by structural conditions – rather than how it can enable them. The toxic ambivalence literature’s framework regarding pollution’s constraining and enabling capacities owes its conceptual approach to long-standing engagements with structure and agency. Through underpinning their analyses with this enduring framework, toxic ambivalence theorists have disregarded significant epistemological histories that have structured their conceptual approach. By demonstrating how ‘Travellers’ ways’ constituted Travellers’ life-building projects, this article not only provides conceptualisations that move beyond the epistemological stickiness of structure and agency frameworks but also extends constraint and enablement approaches in toxic ambivalence literatures. In doing so, the article also expands upon a foundational and enduring social theoretical problematic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnos
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2026.2743703
Primary Topic
Romani and Gypsy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Life Without Flowers: Toxic Ambivalence, Travellers’ Ways, and Insalubrious Attachments in an Urban Travellers’ Camp

Anthony Howarth
Ethnos
Romani and Gypsy Studies
article

A Life Without Flowers: Toxic Ambivalence, Travellers’ Ways, and Insalubrious Attachments in an Urban Travellers’ Camp

Anthony Howarth
article en

Abstract

Travellers’ toxic attachments correspond to the literature on ‘toxic ambivalence’, particularly how pollution can be both constraining and enabling. Although toxic ambivalence theorists provide more nuanced engagements with toxicity than previous anthropological approaches, they still privilege how toxicity constrains participants’ lives – which are shaped by structural conditions – rather than how it can enable them. The toxic ambivalence literature’s framework regarding pollution’s constraining and enabling capacities owes its conceptual approach to long-standing engagements with structure and agency. Through underpinning their analyses with this enduring framework, toxic ambivalence theorists have disregarded significant epistemological histories that have structured their conceptual approach. By demonstrating how ‘Travellers’ ways’ constituted Travellers’ life-building projects, this article not only provides conceptualisations that move beyond the epistemological stickiness of structure and agency frameworks but also extends constraint and enablement approaches in toxic ambivalence literatures. In doing so, the article also expands upon a foundational and enduring social theoretical problematic.

Ethnos
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Romani and Gypsy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.