A Scenario-Based Approach to Optimizing the Investment Portfolio of a Gas-Condensate Asset Under Decarbonization Constraints

Decarbonization requires oil and gas companies to combine gas-monetization projects with measures to improve operational efficiency and reduce emissions. This study develops a scenario-based approach to portfolio selection for a gas-condensate asset, accounting for economic value, risk, net gas-resource requirements, and carbon effects. Projects are evaluated relative to baseline pipeline gas sales. Within-scenario uncertainty is represented using triangular distributions and Latin hypercube sampling. Feasible portfolios are generated by exhaustive enumeration, followed by Pareto selection and risk-adjusted ranking. The synthetic model-based application considers six project solutions, generating 63 nonempty combinations. Under the specified assumptions, the number of feasible portfolios decreases from 37 in the inertial scenario to 19 in the moderate scenario and 2 in the stringent scenario. The mere presence of a decarbonization component does not determine project priority. Operational projects gain portfolio significance when they improve resource use and carbon performance. The capital-intensive project combining value-added gas processing with CCUS plays a different role: for the project set considered, it becomes necessary only when the minimum portfolio carbon requirement exceeds 1.90 but does not exceed 2.40 million t CO2e/year. Above this level, no feasible portfolio can be formed. This threshold interval is case-specific. These results reveal how decarbonization can affect both project ranking and portfolio feasibility, highlighting an asset-level energy–environment–economy trade-off.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182010497
Primary Topic
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scenario-Based Approach to Optimizing the Investment Portfolio of a Gas-Condensate Asset Under Decarbonization Constraints

Alexey Cherepovitsyn, Anastasia Shabalina
Sustainability
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
article

A Scenario-Based Approach to Optimizing the Investment Portfolio of a Gas-Condensate Asset Under Decarbonization Constraints

Alexey Cherepovitsyn, Anastasia Shabalina
article en

Abstract

Decarbonization requires oil and gas companies to combine gas-monetization projects with measures to improve operational efficiency and reduce emissions. This study develops a scenario-based approach to portfolio selection for a gas-condensate asset, accounting for economic value, risk, net gas-resource requirements, and carbon effects. Projects are evaluated relative to baseline pipeline gas sales. Within-scenario uncertainty is represented using triangular distributions and Latin hypercube sampling. Feasible portfolios are generated by exhaustive enumeration, followed by Pareto selection and risk-adjusted ranking. The synthetic model-based application considers six project solutions, generating 63 nonempty combinations. Under the specified assumptions, the number of feasible portfolios decreases from 37 in the inertial scenario to 19 in the moderate scenario and 2 in the stringent scenario. The mere presence of a decarbonization component does not determine project priority. Operational projects gain portfolio significance when they improve resource use and carbon performance. The capital-intensive project combining value-added gas processing with CCUS plays a different role: for the project set considered, it becomes necessary only when the minimum portfolio carbon requirement exceeds 1.90 but does not exceed 2.40 million t CO2e/year. Above this level, no feasible portfolio can be formed. This threshold interval is case-specific. These results reveal how decarbonization can affect both project ranking and portfolio feasibility, highlighting an asset-level energy–environment–economy trade-off.

SustainabilityVol. 18(20)
Saint Petersburg Mining University (RU)
Climate action, Affordable and clean energy, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.