Spatial Distribution of Microbial Biomass and Its Respiratory Activity in Soils of Different Land Uses in the Moscow Region and Metropolitan Moscow

Abstract— Across eleven administrative districts of the Moscow region and the Moscow metropolitan area, 559 survey sites were studied from 2001 to 2020. These sites were grouped by land use types (forest, meadow and fallow land, arable land, and urban soil) and the main soil groups: Albic Podzols, Folic Retisols, Greyzemic Phaeozems, and Luvic Chernozems. At all survey sites, the dominant vegetation and geographic coordinates were recorded, and soil samples were collected from the upper 10 cm of the humus-accumulative layer. Forest soils were represented by 204 sites, meadows and fallow lands by 120, arable land by 43, soils of small towns (8 in total) by 108 sites, and those of the Moscow metropolitan area, by 84. In towns and cities, survey sites were selected in recreational, residential, and industrial land uses. The soil samples were analyzed for organic carbon (Corg), microbial biomass carbon (Cmic), basal (microbial) respiration (BR), and pH. The Cmic/Corg and BR/Corg ratios were calculated. It has been shown that the microbial parameters of soils for different land uses in small towns did not differ significantly, but in the megalopolis they did. In forest soils, the Cmic, BR, Cmic/Corg, and BR/Corg values were the highest and amounted, on average, to 589 μg C/g, 1.07 μg C–CO2/(g h), 1.99%, and 36.0 μg C–CO2/(g Corg h), respectively; in meadows they were lower, and in arable lands and in small towns they were the lowest (on average, 249 and 328 μg Cmic/g, 0.41 and 0.60 μg C–CO2/(g h), 1.14 and 0.82%, 18.3 and 15.1 μg C–CO2/(g Corg h), respectively). The spatial distribution of microbial indicators of soils in the region is visualized using the spatial interpolation method, separately for natural (forest, meadow, and fallow lands) and anthropogenically transformed (arable land, small towns) ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eurasian Soil Science
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064229326601599
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Distribution of Microbial Biomass and Its Respiratory Activity in Soils of Different Land Uses in the Moscow Region and Metropolitan Moscow

Ekaterina S. Mukvich, Иващенко Кристина Викторовна, Aleksey Portnov, Elvira Anvarbekovna Dovletyarova et al.
Eurasian Soil Science
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Spatial Distribution of Microbial Biomass and Its Respiratory Activity in Soils of Different Land Uses in the Moscow Region and Metropolitan Moscow

Ekaterina S. Mukvich, Иващенко Кристина Викторовна, Aleksey Portnov, Elvira Anvarbekovna Dovletyarova, Nadezhda D. Ananyeva, A. E. Robert
article en

Abstract

Abstract— Across eleven administrative districts of the Moscow region and the Moscow metropolitan area, 559 survey sites were studied from 2001 to 2020. These sites were grouped by land use types (forest, meadow and fallow land, arable land, and urban soil) and the main soil groups: Albic Podzols, Folic Retisols, Greyzemic Phaeozems, and Luvic Chernozems. At all survey sites, the dominant vegetation and geographic coordinates were recorded, and soil samples were collected from the upper 10 cm of the humus-accumulative layer. Forest soils were represented by 204 sites, meadows and fallow lands by 120, arable land by 43, soils of small towns (8 in total) by 108 sites, and those of the Moscow metropolitan area, by 84. In towns and cities, survey sites were selected in recreational, residential, and industrial land uses. The soil samples were analyzed for organic carbon (Corg), microbial biomass carbon (Cmic), basal (microbial) respiration (BR), and pH. The Cmic/Corg and BR/Corg ratios were calculated. It has been shown that the microbial parameters of soils for different land uses in small towns did not differ significantly, but in the megalopolis they did. In forest soils, the Cmic, BR, Cmic/Corg, and BR/Corg values were the highest and amounted, on average, to 589 μg C/g, 1.07 μg C–CO2/(g h), 1.99%, and 36.0 μg C–CO2/(g Corg h), respectively; in meadows they were lower, and in arable lands and in small towns they were the lowest (on average, 249 and 328 μg Cmic/g, 0.41 and 0.60 μg C–CO2/(g h), 1.14 and 0.82%, 18.3 and 15.1 μg C–CO2/(g Corg h), respectively). The spatial distribution of microbial indicators of soils in the region is visualized using the spatial interpolation method, separately for natural (forest, meadow, and fallow lands) and anthropogenically transformed (arable land, small towns) ecosystems.

Eurasian Soil ScienceVol. 59(11)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), Institute of Physical-Chemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science (RU)
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.