Strategic piano practice in cognitive and metacognitive regulation

This integrative review synthesizes evidence on how cognitive, metacognitive, and repetition-regulation processes shape strategic piano practice. The review corpus comprised 63 empirical, review, and theoretical sources spanning music education, cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and motor learning; the original corpus was re-screened and updated through September 2026. Piano practice is defined here as intentional work undertaken to prepare, stabilise, evaluate, or adapt a performance, including keyboard rehearsal, score analysis, mental rehearsal, and recording-based review. The synthesis focuses primarily on advanced and professional pianists working in Western classical solo and studio traditions, while evidence from children, novices, and broader instrumental settings is used to identify developmental and contextual boundaries. Findings indicate that segmentation, tempo manipulation, hands-separate work, auditory imagery, goal setting, self-monitoring, and delayed self-assessment become effective when they are selected and revised in response to performance evidence. Unvaried repetition may produce immediate fluency that does not necessarily predict durable retention, whereas strategically varied trials can expose errors and strengthen adaptability. The proposed model aligns these processes with cyclical self-regulated learning: forethought guides strategy choice, performance generates evidence, and self-reflection updates subsequent goals and repetitions. The review supports explicit strategy instruction while cautioning that effects depend on expertise, task, repertoire, feedback source, and musical goal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Music Education Research
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2026.2747894
Primary Topic
Diverse Music Education Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic piano practice in cognitive and metacognitive regulation

Yiling Li
Music Education Research
Diverse Music Education Insights
article

Strategic piano practice in cognitive and metacognitive regulation

Yiling Li
article en

Abstract

This integrative review synthesizes evidence on how cognitive, metacognitive, and repetition-regulation processes shape strategic piano practice. The review corpus comprised 63 empirical, review, and theoretical sources spanning music education, cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and motor learning; the original corpus was re-screened and updated through September 2026. Piano practice is defined here as intentional work undertaken to prepare, stabilise, evaluate, or adapt a performance, including keyboard rehearsal, score analysis, mental rehearsal, and recording-based review. The synthesis focuses primarily on advanced and professional pianists working in Western classical solo and studio traditions, while evidence from children, novices, and broader instrumental settings is used to identify developmental and contextual boundaries. Findings indicate that segmentation, tempo manipulation, hands-separate work, auditory imagery, goal setting, self-monitoring, and delayed self-assessment become effective when they are selected and revised in response to performance evidence. Unvaried repetition may produce immediate fluency that does not necessarily predict durable retention, whereas strategically varied trials can expose errors and strengthen adaptability. The proposed model aligns these processes with cyclical self-regulated learning: forethought guides strategy choice, performance generates evidence, and self-reflection updates subsequent goals and repetitions. The review supports explicit strategy instruction while cautioning that effects depend on expertise, task, repertoire, feedback source, and musical goal.

Music Education Research
University of South Florida (US)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Diverse Music Education Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.