Repeat Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: CFA/DOA-Guided Substrate Ablation Versus Re-PVI Alone in the Prematurely Terminated Randomized AF-CAM Trial
Background and Aims: Currently, no standard approach exists for substrate ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess whether repeat pulmonary vein isolation (Re-PVI) plus targeted substrate ablation improves long-term outcomes compared with Re-PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing a second ablation. Methods: The AF-CAM study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, multi-center clinical trial. Patients with persistent AF undergoing a second ablation for arrhythmia recurrence were randomized 1:1 to either Group A (Re-PVI alone) or Group B (Re-PVI plus targeted ablation). The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (>30 s) between 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Results: Between August 2021 and November 2023, 56 patients (mean age 68 ± 10 years, 32% women) were randomized before the trial was terminated prematurely. There was no evidence of a difference in arrhythmia recurrence between the treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence, Group B vs. Group A: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 2.33; p = 0.85). Pulmonary vein reconnection was present in 86% of patients and was not associated with the risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence (HR 0.927, 95% CI [0.275, 3.120]). Across both groups, catheter ablation was associated with improvements in quality of life (AFEQT score) and reductions in BNP levels during follow-up. Conclusions: In this prematurely terminated randomized trial, adding CFA- and DOA-guided substrate ablation to Re-PVI did not demonstrate an improvement in freedom from atrial arrhythmia compared with Re-PVI alone. The small sample size and imprecise treatment estimate preclude a definitive conclusion about the efficacy of the adjunctive strategy. AFEQT scores increased and BNP levels decreased over follow-up in the studied patients. Larger studies are needed to further evaluate the complex atrial substrate in persistent AF.
Authors
- Jannis Dickow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0374-4983)
- Christian G. Meyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0217-3960)
- Jens Hartmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-1851)
- Peter Wohlmuth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1636-7865)
- Melanie Gunawardene (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7561-7185)
- Nele Geßler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5626-7749)
- Kathrin Heitmann
- Rahin Wahedi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7771-8682)
- Stephan Willems (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-5749)
- Katharina Scherschel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3237-140X)
- Paweł Kuklik (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8440-654X)
- Tim Harloff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1506-5366)
- Arian Sultan
- Susanne Scholz
- Arso Zahir-Akkra
Institutions
- MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE)
- Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (DE)
- Asklepios Klinik St. Georg (DE)
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf (DE)
- University Hospital Cologne (DE)
- Asklepios (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2026-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15208010
- Primary Topic
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00