Repeat Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: CFA/DOA-Guided Substrate Ablation Versus Re-PVI Alone in the Prematurely Terminated Randomized AF-CAM Trial

Background and Aims: Currently, no standard approach exists for substrate ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess whether repeat pulmonary vein isolation (Re-PVI) plus targeted substrate ablation improves long-term outcomes compared with Re-PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing a second ablation. Methods: The AF-CAM study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, multi-center clinical trial. Patients with persistent AF undergoing a second ablation for arrhythmia recurrence were randomized 1:1 to either Group A (Re-PVI alone) or Group B (Re-PVI plus targeted ablation). The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (>30 s) between 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Results: Between August 2021 and November 2023, 56 patients (mean age 68 ± 10 years, 32% women) were randomized before the trial was terminated prematurely. There was no evidence of a difference in arrhythmia recurrence between the treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence, Group B vs. Group A: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 2.33; p = 0.85). Pulmonary vein reconnection was present in 86% of patients and was not associated with the risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence (HR 0.927, 95% CI [0.275, 3.120]). Across both groups, catheter ablation was associated with improvements in quality of life (AFEQT score) and reductions in BNP levels during follow-up. Conclusions: In this prematurely terminated randomized trial, adding CFA- and DOA-guided substrate ablation to Re-PVI did not demonstrate an improvement in freedom from atrial arrhythmia compared with Re-PVI alone. The small sample size and imprecise treatment estimate preclude a definitive conclusion about the efficacy of the adjunctive strategy. AFEQT scores increased and BNP levels decreased over follow-up in the studied patients. Larger studies are needed to further evaluate the complex atrial substrate in persistent AF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15208010
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repeat Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: CFA/DOA-Guided Substrate Ablation Versus Re-PVI Alone in the Prematurely Terminated Randomized AF-CAM Trial

Jannis Dickow, Christian G. Meyer, Jens Hartmann, Peter Wohlmuth et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Repeat Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: CFA/DOA-Guided Substrate Ablation Versus Re-PVI Alone in the Prematurely Terminated Randomized AF-CAM Trial

Jannis Dickow, Christian G. Meyer, Jens Hartmann, Peter Wohlmuth, Melanie Gunawardene, Nele Geßler, Kathrin Heitmann, Rahin Wahedi, Stephan Willems, Katharina Scherschel, Paweł Kuklik, Tim Harloff, Arian Sultan, Susanne Scholz, Arso Zahir-Akkra
article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: Currently, no standard approach exists for substrate ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess whether repeat pulmonary vein isolation (Re-PVI) plus targeted substrate ablation improves long-term outcomes compared with Re-PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing a second ablation. Methods: The AF-CAM study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, multi-center clinical trial. Patients with persistent AF undergoing a second ablation for arrhythmia recurrence were randomized 1:1 to either Group A (Re-PVI alone) or Group B (Re-PVI plus targeted ablation). The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (>30 s) between 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Results: Between August 2021 and November 2023, 56 patients (mean age 68 ± 10 years, 32% women) were randomized before the trial was terminated prematurely. There was no evidence of a difference in arrhythmia recurrence between the treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence, Group B vs. Group A: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 2.33; p = 0.85). Pulmonary vein reconnection was present in 86% of patients and was not associated with the risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence (HR 0.927, 95% CI [0.275, 3.120]). Across both groups, catheter ablation was associated with improvements in quality of life (AFEQT score) and reductions in BNP levels during follow-up. Conclusions: In this prematurely terminated randomized trial, adding CFA- and DOA-guided substrate ablation to Re-PVI did not demonstrate an improvement in freedom from atrial arrhythmia compared with Re-PVI alone. The small sample size and imprecise treatment estimate preclude a definitive conclusion about the efficacy of the adjunctive strategy. AFEQT scores increased and BNP levels decreased over follow-up in the studied patients. Larger studies are needed to further evaluate the complex atrial substrate in persistent AF.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(20)
MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE), Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (DE), Asklepios Klinik St. Georg (DE), Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Asklepios (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.