Resilience and adaptation in forest co-management systems

The last few decades of co-managing forests have been criticised for not ensuring cultural integrity and direct benefits for local people. This is evident in many parts of Cameroon, where neoliberal projects and restrictions on forest rights imposed by co-management systems threaten Indigenous peoples and their spiritual ties to the environment. While co-management promises power-sharing, disputes over how local and Indigenous peoples may use forest resources remain challenging. Underlying this uncertainty, too little is known about the coping mechanisms people adopt. Hence, this paper uses an interpretive stance to demonstrate how people attempt to cope with the uncertainties of co-management systems where forests contain areas of spiritual importance. Particularly, we ask whether options exist for people to sustain their cultural relations with nature in situations of disagreement within the system. Using forest co-management as an example, we synthesize secondary evidence from our previously published case studies in Cameroon, covering the Korup communities of Korup National Park (KNP), the Bakweri communities surrounding Mount Cameroon National Park (MCNP), and the Baka communities of Boumba-Bek National Park (BBNP). We explore how they navigate precarious situations in co-managing national parks. The results show that, despite co-management regulations that prohibit unauthorized access to national parks, people continue their traditional use of forests through their agency and resilience. These practices show in reciprocal compliance and covert forms of resistance. For instance, some people cooperate with park officials to protect their traditions, while others circumvent the system to continue hunting and foraging despite the risks involved. Future research should explore spiritual governance that honours the forest's spiritual significance. This could improve co-management by integrating practices rooted in caring for the forest's spiritual essence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Policy and Economics
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103932
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilience and adaptation in forest co-management systems

Ngambouk Vitalis Pemunta, Yvonne Kiki Nchanji, Ayonghe Akonwi Nebasifu, Efuet Simon Akem
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Management and Policy
article

Resilience and adaptation in forest co-management systems

Ngambouk Vitalis Pemunta, Yvonne Kiki Nchanji, Ayonghe Akonwi Nebasifu, Efuet Simon Akem
article en

Abstract

The last few decades of co-managing forests have been criticised for not ensuring cultural integrity and direct benefits for local people. This is evident in many parts of Cameroon, where neoliberal projects and restrictions on forest rights imposed by co-management systems threaten Indigenous peoples and their spiritual ties to the environment. While co-management promises power-sharing, disputes over how local and Indigenous peoples may use forest resources remain challenging. Underlying this uncertainty, too little is known about the coping mechanisms people adopt. Hence, this paper uses an interpretive stance to demonstrate how people attempt to cope with the uncertainties of co-management systems where forests contain areas of spiritual importance. Particularly, we ask whether options exist for people to sustain their cultural relations with nature in situations of disagreement within the system. Using forest co-management as an example, we synthesize secondary evidence from our previously published case studies in Cameroon, covering the Korup communities of Korup National Park (KNP), the Bakweri communities surrounding Mount Cameroon National Park (MCNP), and the Baka communities of Boumba-Bek National Park (BBNP). We explore how they navigate precarious situations in co-managing national parks. The results show that, despite co-management regulations that prohibit unauthorized access to national parks, people continue their traditional use of forests through their agency and resilience. These practices show in reciprocal compliance and covert forms of resistance. For instance, some people cooperate with park officials to protect their traditions, while others circumvent the system to continue hunting and foraging despite the risks involved. Future research should explore spiritual governance that honours the forest's spiritual significance. This could improve co-management by integrating practices rooted in caring for the forest's spiritual essence.

Forest Policy and EconomicsVol. 192
University of Buea (CM), Linnaeus University (SE), United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (JP), University of Toyama (JP)
Centrum för Miljöforskning och -Undervisning vid Helsingfors Universitet
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.