A health policy analysis of England’s 2023–28 suicide prevention strategy

Purpose This paper aims to examine how the multi-sectoral design of England’s Suicide Prevention Strategy 2023–2028 shapes implementation, accountability and evaluability. Design/methodology/approach Directed qualitative content analysis was conducted using the Health Policy Triangle, with Leichter’s situational, structural, cultural and environmental categories applied across its four domains. Findings The Strategy combines population level prevention with targeted interventions across multiple sectors. Its evaluability is strongest where actions have clear ownership, timescales, outputs and reporting arrangements, but weaker where responsibility is shared or commitments remain exploratory. Research limitations/implications This single document analysis does not assess implementation outcomes. Further research should examine governance documents and local delivery models. Practical implications Clearer accountability, common implementation measures and consistent cross sector reporting would strengthen the ability for effective evaluation. Originality/value The paper identifies the conditions under which multi-sectoral suicide-prevention policy becomes more or less evaluable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Mental Health
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-04-2026-0074
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A health policy analysis of England’s 2023–28 suicide prevention strategy

Christopher Joseph Alexander
Journal of Public Mental Health
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

A health policy analysis of England’s 2023–28 suicide prevention strategy

Christopher Joseph Alexander
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine how the multi-sectoral design of England’s Suicide Prevention Strategy 2023–2028 shapes implementation, accountability and evaluability. Design/methodology/approach Directed qualitative content analysis was conducted using the Health Policy Triangle, with Leichter’s situational, structural, cultural and environmental categories applied across its four domains. Findings The Strategy combines population level prevention with targeted interventions across multiple sectors. Its evaluability is strongest where actions have clear ownership, timescales, outputs and reporting arrangements, but weaker where responsibility is shared or commitments remain exploratory. Research limitations/implications This single document analysis does not assess implementation outcomes. Further research should examine governance documents and local delivery models. Practical implications Clearer accountability, common implementation measures and consistent cross sector reporting would strengthen the ability for effective evaluation. Originality/value The paper identifies the conditions under which multi-sectoral suicide-prevention policy becomes more or less evaluable.

Journal of Public Mental Health
Mental Health Research UK (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.