Hierarchical Multiple-Instance Learning for Vehicle-Level Battery Anomaly Detection from Charging Data Streams

Vehicle-level battery labels paired with many charging records create a weakly supervised rare-event problem. We evaluated a two-level multiple-instance framework on 191 vehicles (184 normal and seven source-coded abnormal) from the public EVBattery archive, using 38,200 charging snippets. Nine normal-reference anomaly detectors were combined with fixed or learned vehicle-level pooling under six repetitions of five-fold vehicle-disjoint internal cross-validation. All preprocessing and detector fitting used training vehicles only; score mapping used aggregation-training vehicles; decision thresholds used a separate 13-14-vehicle validation partition containing only one or two abnormal vehicles. PCA reconstruction with 95th-percentile pooling produced the highest numerical repeat-mean average precision (0.342) among 46 evaluated pipelines. A leave-one-repeat-out selection-sensitivity diagnostic selected this pipeline in five of six analyses and yielded mean held-repeat average precision 0.318 ± 0.078; because all repeats reuse the same 191 vehicles, this is not an independent test estimate. After averaging six out-of-fold probabilities per vehicle, average precision was 0.371 and AUROC 0.796. Threshold-based metrics are exploratory: the 30 validation-derived thresholds ranged from 0.267 to 0.999, and 17 equalled 0.500. No pairwise comparison survived Holm correction, uncertainty was wide, and calibration was poor. The results identify PCA plus upper-tail pooling only as the highest numerical internal benchmark in this cohort, not as an unbiased estimate of a selected final model, confirmed physical diagnosis, or deployment-ready probability estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batteries
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries12100431
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hierarchical Multiple-Instance Learning for Vehicle-Level Battery Anomaly Detection from Charging Data Streams

Bonginkosi Allen Thango, Mavis Fortunate Makama
Batteries
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Hierarchical Multiple-Instance Learning for Vehicle-Level Battery Anomaly Detection from Charging Data Streams

Bonginkosi Allen Thango, Mavis Fortunate Makama
article en

Abstract

Vehicle-level battery labels paired with many charging records create a weakly supervised rare-event problem. We evaluated a two-level multiple-instance framework on 191 vehicles (184 normal and seven source-coded abnormal) from the public EVBattery archive, using 38,200 charging snippets. Nine normal-reference anomaly detectors were combined with fixed or learned vehicle-level pooling under six repetitions of five-fold vehicle-disjoint internal cross-validation. All preprocessing and detector fitting used training vehicles only; score mapping used aggregation-training vehicles; decision thresholds used a separate 13-14-vehicle validation partition containing only one or two abnormal vehicles. PCA reconstruction with 95th-percentile pooling produced the highest numerical repeat-mean average precision (0.342) among 46 evaluated pipelines. A leave-one-repeat-out selection-sensitivity diagnostic selected this pipeline in five of six analyses and yielded mean held-repeat average precision 0.318 ± 0.078; because all repeats reuse the same 191 vehicles, this is not an independent test estimate. After averaging six out-of-fold probabilities per vehicle, average precision was 0.371 and AUROC 0.796. Threshold-based metrics are exploratory: the 30 validation-derived thresholds ranged from 0.267 to 0.999, and 17 equalled 0.500. No pairwise comparison survived Holm correction, uncertainty was wide, and calibration was poor. The results identify PCA plus upper-tail pooling only as the highest numerical internal benchmark in this cohort, not as an unbiased estimate of a selected final model, confirmed physical diagnosis, or deployment-ready probability estimation.

BatteriesVol. 12(10)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.