Reliability of a functional electromechanical dynamometer for a bilateral standing press exercise at intensities of 30% and 60% of isometric peak force in trained women

Background Determining the reliability of exercise instruments and protocols in the fields of health and sports performance is of great interest due to their close relationship with monitoring and decision-making in athletes. Studies in trained women are limited, and more evidence is needed on performance variables and the reliability of exercise protocols. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of an exercise protocol for determining mean muscle strength, mean velocity, and mean power during the bilateral standing press (BSP) in trained women. Methods Sixteen trained women (age = 20.0 ± 2.30 years; body mass = 67.63 ± 6.68 kg; height = 1.65 ± 0.06 m) participated in this repeated-measures study. Absolute reliability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV), and relative reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for a bilateral standing press (BSP) exercise protocol performed at intensities of 30% and 60% of isometric peak force (IPF). Results Mean muscle strength showed acceptable absolute reliability and extremely high relative reliability at both 30% IPF (CV = 6.51%; ICC = 0.94) and 60% IPF (CV = 5.03%; ICC = 0.97). Mean velocity showed extremely high relative reliability at 60% IPF (ICC = 0.92), but its absolute reliability was not acceptable at either 30% IPF (CV = 10.10%; ICC = 0.75) or 60% IPF (CV = 14.16%; ICC = 0.92). Mean power also exceeded the predefined CV threshold at 30% IPF (CV = 11.16%; ICC = 0.85) and at 60% IPF (CV = 14.35%; ICC = 0.89). Conclusions These findings suggest that the BSP protocol using functional electromechanical dynamometry is reliable for assessing mean muscle strength in trained women. However, mean velocity and mean power should be interpreted with caution, as their absolute reliability did not reach the predefined threshold of acceptable reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21777
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of a functional electromechanical dynamometer for a bilateral standing press exercise at intensities of 30% and 60% of isometric peak force in trained women

Claudio Carvajal-Parodi, Luis Javier Chirosa Ríos, Oscar Andrades-Ramírez, Ángela Rodríguez‐Perea et al.
PeerJ
Sports Performance and Training
article

Reliability of a functional electromechanical dynamometer for a bilateral standing press exercise at intensities of 30% and 60% of isometric peak force in trained women

Claudio Carvajal-Parodi, Luis Javier Chirosa Ríos, Oscar Andrades-Ramírez, Ángela Rodríguez‐Perea, Álvaro Huerta Ojeda, David Ulloa-Díaz, Sergio Araya Sierralta, Luis Romero-Vera, Claudio Cifuentes-Zapata
article en

Abstract

Background Determining the reliability of exercise instruments and protocols in the fields of health and sports performance is of great interest due to their close relationship with monitoring and decision-making in athletes. Studies in trained women are limited, and more evidence is needed on performance variables and the reliability of exercise protocols. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of an exercise protocol for determining mean muscle strength, mean velocity, and mean power during the bilateral standing press (BSP) in trained women. Methods Sixteen trained women (age = 20.0 ± 2.30 years; body mass = 67.63 ± 6.68 kg; height = 1.65 ± 0.06 m) participated in this repeated-measures study. Absolute reliability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV), and relative reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for a bilateral standing press (BSP) exercise protocol performed at intensities of 30% and 60% of isometric peak force (IPF). Results Mean muscle strength showed acceptable absolute reliability and extremely high relative reliability at both 30% IPF (CV = 6.51%; ICC = 0.94) and 60% IPF (CV = 5.03%; ICC = 0.97). Mean velocity showed extremely high relative reliability at 60% IPF (ICC = 0.92), but its absolute reliability was not acceptable at either 30% IPF (CV = 10.10%; ICC = 0.75) or 60% IPF (CV = 14.16%; ICC = 0.92). Mean power also exceeded the predefined CV threshold at 30% IPF (CV = 11.16%; ICC = 0.85) and at 60% IPF (CV = 14.35%; ICC = 0.89). Conclusions These findings suggest that the BSP protocol using functional electromechanical dynamometry is reliable for assessing mean muscle strength in trained women. However, mean velocity and mean power should be interpreted with caution, as their absolute reliability did not reach the predefined threshold of acceptable reliability.

PeerJVol. 14
University of Concepción (CL), Universidad de Granada (ES), University of Atacama (CL), San Sebastián University (CL), Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (CL), Universidad de León (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.