From Prototype to Sustainable Food Production: Translational Barriers and Design Priorities for Agricultural Biosensing Systems

ABSTRACT Agricultural biosensors could advance sustainable food production by enabling timely detection of crop stress, pathogens, nutrient imbalances, and environmental contaminants. Despite decades of research, however, robust commercial biosensing platforms remain uncommon because analytical performance under controlled conditions does not necessarily translate into dependable field operation or measurable sustainability benefits. Sensors affected by fouling, calibration drift, unstable biorecognition elements, ambiguous biological signals, or frequent replacement may increase cost and material consumption without improving management decisions or reducing agricultural inputs. This perspective article examines the technical, biological, operational, and socioeconomic barriers that limit the transition of agricultural biosensors from laboratory prototypes to resource‐efficient decision‐support systems. It considers performance standards, recognition‐element durability, plant–device biocompatibility, validation practices, user education, and uncertainty communication across open fields, controlled‐environment agriculture, plant wearables, and in vivo platforms. A sustainability‐oriented framework is proposed that connects analytical validity and operational reliability with decision relevance, maintainability, lifecycle considerations, and responsible resource use. Future progress will require biological co‐design, realistic multiscale validation, multimodal data integration, modular and repairable devices, actionable user interfaces, and transparent communication of uncertainty. Agricultural biosensors should ultimately be evaluated not only by their ability to detect target analytes but also by whether they enable reliable interventions that reduce resource consumption, environmental burdens, production risks, and avoidable waste.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.70221
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Prototype to Sustainable Food Production: Translational Barriers and Design Priorities for Agricultural Biosensing Systems

Abhilash Kumar Chandel, Frank Efe Erukainure, David B. Langston, Blake N. Johnson et al.
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment
Smart Agriculture and AI
article

From Prototype to Sustainable Food Production: Translational Barriers and Design Priorities for Agricultural Biosensing Systems

Abhilash Kumar Chandel, Frank Efe Erukainure, David B. Langston, Blake N. Johnson, Zachary M. Easton
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Agricultural biosensors could advance sustainable food production by enabling timely detection of crop stress, pathogens, nutrient imbalances, and environmental contaminants. Despite decades of research, however, robust commercial biosensing platforms remain uncommon because analytical performance under controlled conditions does not necessarily translate into dependable field operation or measurable sustainability benefits. Sensors affected by fouling, calibration drift, unstable biorecognition elements, ambiguous biological signals, or frequent replacement may increase cost and material consumption without improving management decisions or reducing agricultural inputs. This perspective article examines the technical, biological, operational, and socioeconomic barriers that limit the transition of agricultural biosensors from laboratory prototypes to resource‐efficient decision‐support systems. It considers performance standards, recognition‐element durability, plant–device biocompatibility, validation practices, user education, and uncertainty communication across open fields, controlled‐environment agriculture, plant wearables, and in vivo platforms. A sustainability‐oriented framework is proposed that connects analytical validity and operational reliability with decision relevance, maintainability, lifecycle considerations, and responsible resource use. Future progress will require biological co‐design, realistic multiscale validation, multimodal data integration, modular and repairable devices, actionable user interfaces, and transparent communication of uncertainty. Agricultural biosensors should ultimately be evaluated not only by their ability to detect target analytes but also by whether they enable reliable interventions that reduce resource consumption, environmental burdens, production risks, and avoidable waste.

Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and EnvironmentVol. 5(4)
Tidewater Community College (US), Virginia Gastroenterology Institute (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Smart Agriculture and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.