Linking rainfall index variability and program performance: implications for Pasture, Rangeland and Forage-Rainfall Index program

Purpose This study aims to determine whether areas and intervals with lower average precipitation exhibit greater rainfall index variability in the Pasture, Rangeland and Forage Rainfall Index (PRF-RI) program, and whether this variability widens the gap between expected payouts and premium rates, thereby raising loss ratios. Design/methodology/approach Using PRF-RI and precipitation data for 66 South Dakota counties (1948–2024), we apply a linear mixed model that accounts for correlation among overlapping bi-monthly intervals to relate index variability (coefficient of variation) to long-run average precipitation. We then link this variability to expected payouts and loss ratios by combining the PRF-RI payment calculation factor with 2024 premium rates, comparing outcomes under the empirical distribution of the rainfall index and a truncated normal distribution. Finally, we estimate the relationship between average annual precipitation and cumulative loss ratios (2016–2024) across 43 states. Findings We find that intervals and regions with lower average precipitation exhibit greater variability in the PRF-RI. Loss ratios are higher in drier intervals and regions, but this pattern is not driven by non-normality alone: the truncated normal assumption overstates expected payouts relative to the empirical distribution and can push premium rates too high. Across states, average annual precipitation is negatively related to cumulative loss ratios – states where recent precipitation (2016–2024) has fallen below long-run averages tend to experience higher losses. Originality/value This paper fills a gap in understanding PRF-RI program design by showing how long-run precipitation levels and bi-monthly rainfall variability widen the gap between expected payouts and premium rates and affect actual loss ratios – offering insights for premium rating, interval design, and the program's long-term viability under climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Finance Review
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/afr-02-2026-0042
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking rainfall index variability and program performance: implications for Pasture, Rangeland and Forage-Rainfall Index program

Whoi Cho, Abby ShalekBriski
Agricultural Finance Review
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Linking rainfall index variability and program performance: implications for Pasture, Rangeland and Forage-Rainfall Index program

Whoi Cho, Abby ShalekBriski
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to determine whether areas and intervals with lower average precipitation exhibit greater rainfall index variability in the Pasture, Rangeland and Forage Rainfall Index (PRF-RI) program, and whether this variability widens the gap between expected payouts and premium rates, thereby raising loss ratios. Design/methodology/approach Using PRF-RI and precipitation data for 66 South Dakota counties (1948–2024), we apply a linear mixed model that accounts for correlation among overlapping bi-monthly intervals to relate index variability (coefficient of variation) to long-run average precipitation. We then link this variability to expected payouts and loss ratios by combining the PRF-RI payment calculation factor with 2024 premium rates, comparing outcomes under the empirical distribution of the rainfall index and a truncated normal distribution. Finally, we estimate the relationship between average annual precipitation and cumulative loss ratios (2016–2024) across 43 states. Findings We find that intervals and regions with lower average precipitation exhibit greater variability in the PRF-RI. Loss ratios are higher in drier intervals and regions, but this pattern is not driven by non-normality alone: the truncated normal assumption overstates expected payouts relative to the empirical distribution and can push premium rates too high. Across states, average annual precipitation is negatively related to cumulative loss ratios – states where recent precipitation (2016–2024) has fallen below long-run averages tend to experience higher losses. Originality/value This paper fills a gap in understanding PRF-RI program design by showing how long-run precipitation levels and bi-monthly rainfall variability widen the gap between expected payouts and premium rates and affect actual loss ratios – offering insights for premium rating, interval design, and the program's long-term viability under climate change.

Agricultural Finance Review
Oklahoma State University (US), Dakota State University (US), South Dakota State University (US)
Zero hunger, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.