Facility-Level Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Natural- and Faux-Fur Enterprises: A Descriptive Case Study

This study provides enterprise-level evidence on the magnitude, source composition, and variability of operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in natural- and faux-fur enterprises in Western Macedonia, Greece. The 2025 analysis comprises nine enterprises (five natural fur and four faux fur) with comparable inventories, drawn from a broader sample of 54 enterprises within an approximate regional frame of 200. The restricted facility indicator combines Scope 1 stationary heating-oil combustion and Scope 2 purchased electricity. Mean emissions were 4.982 and 6.110 t CO2e per enterprise in the natural-fur and faux-fur groups, respectively, a descriptive difference of 18.46%. Heating oil was the dominant source in every enterprise, accounting for 65.64% and 68.53% of the respective group component totals. Observed dispersion was greater in the natural-fur group (sample SD 1.550 versus 0.582 t CO2e). Including company-vehicle emissions yielded a difference of 18.83%, while leave-one-out differences ranged from 14.18% to 29.58%, indicating sensitivity of the magnitude to individual observations. The source profile identifies heating as a priority for facility energy audits. Because the subset is small, non-random, heterogeneous, and not normalized by activity, the findings do not support causal or sector-wide inference or a comparative product life-cycle assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environments
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13100558
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facility-Level Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Natural- and Faux-Fur Enterprises: A Descriptive Case Study

Dimitris Ziouzios, Vasileios Vasileiadis, Aikaterini Tsepoura, Theofylaktos Metallidis et al.
Environments
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Facility-Level Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Natural- and Faux-Fur Enterprises: A Descriptive Case Study

Dimitris Ziouzios, Vasileios Vasileiadis, Aikaterini Tsepoura, Theofylaktos Metallidis, Tania Katotikidou
article en

Abstract

This study provides enterprise-level evidence on the magnitude, source composition, and variability of operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in natural- and faux-fur enterprises in Western Macedonia, Greece. The 2025 analysis comprises nine enterprises (five natural fur and four faux fur) with comparable inventories, drawn from a broader sample of 54 enterprises within an approximate regional frame of 200. The restricted facility indicator combines Scope 1 stationary heating-oil combustion and Scope 2 purchased electricity. Mean emissions were 4.982 and 6.110 t CO2e per enterprise in the natural-fur and faux-fur groups, respectively, a descriptive difference of 18.46%. Heating oil was the dominant source in every enterprise, accounting for 65.64% and 68.53% of the respective group component totals. Observed dispersion was greater in the natural-fur group (sample SD 1.550 versus 0.582 t CO2e). Including company-vehicle emissions yielded a difference of 18.83%, while leave-one-out differences ranged from 14.18% to 29.58%, indicating sensitivity of the magnitude to individual observations. The source profile identifies heating as a priority for facility energy audits. Because the subset is small, non-random, heterogeneous, and not normalized by activity, the findings do not support causal or sector-wide inference or a comparative product life-cycle assessment.

EnvironmentsVol. 13(10)
University of Western Macedonia (GR)
Climate action, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.