Momentary loneliness and cognitive performance variability in daily life: an ecological momentary assessment study

Loneliness is increasingly recognised as a dynamic risk factor for cognitive health outcomes, yet little is known about how momentary fluctuations in loneliness relate to cognitive functioning in daily life. In the current research, 157 mid-to-later life adults completed ecological momentary assessments five times per day for 20 days, reporting momentary loneliness and completing brief mobile cognitive tasks. Using Bayesian mixed-effects location-scale models, we examined within- and between-person associations between momentary loneliness and both levels and variability of cognitive performance across processing speed, working memory, and episodic memory. Results showed largely null and inconsistent associations between loneliness and overall cognitive performance (across cognitive domains). However, exploratory domain-specific analyses indicated that greater instability in momentary loneliness was associated with greater variability in processing speed and working memory. At the within-person level, greater momentary loneliness was associated with better and less variable episodic memory performance, with associations differing by social context, trait loneliness, and age. Overall, findings suggest that associations between loneliness and cognitive functioning in daily life may not be uniform but vary across cognitive domains, timescales, and contextual conditions, highlighting the importance of dynamic and context-sensitive models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2747128
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Momentary loneliness and cognitive performance variability in daily life: an ecological momentary assessment study

Anthony D. Ong, Karina Van Bogart, Laura Thi Germine, Sijing Shao et al.
Cognition & Emotion
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Momentary loneliness and cognitive performance variability in daily life: an ecological momentary assessment study

Anthony D. Ong, Karina Van Bogart, Laura Thi Germine, Sijing Shao, Zoë Hawks, Emorie D Beck, Eileen Kranz Graham
article en

Abstract

Loneliness is increasingly recognised as a dynamic risk factor for cognitive health outcomes, yet little is known about how momentary fluctuations in loneliness relate to cognitive functioning in daily life. In the current research, 157 mid-to-later life adults completed ecological momentary assessments five times per day for 20 days, reporting momentary loneliness and completing brief mobile cognitive tasks. Using Bayesian mixed-effects location-scale models, we examined within- and between-person associations between momentary loneliness and both levels and variability of cognitive performance across processing speed, working memory, and episodic memory. Results showed largely null and inconsistent associations between loneliness and overall cognitive performance (across cognitive domains). However, exploratory domain-specific analyses indicated that greater instability in momentary loneliness was associated with greater variability in processing speed and working memory. At the within-person level, greater momentary loneliness was associated with better and less variable episodic memory performance, with associations differing by social context, trait loneliness, and age. Overall, findings suggest that associations between loneliness and cognitive functioning in daily life may not be uniform but vary across cognitive domains, timescales, and contextual conditions, highlighting the importance of dynamic and context-sensitive models.

Cognition & Emotion
Northwestern University (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Brooklyn Hospital Center (US), Florida International University (US), Cornell University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
National Institute on Aging
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.