When synthetic Delphi panels work: a graph-native methodology for participatory foresight under structural complexity

Foresight methodology has historically expanded one mode at a time — from supernatural divination through hermeneutic utopias, technical forecasting, emancipatory foresight, and participatory creative futures. The widespread adoption of large language models opens a sixth mode, synthetic foresight , in which participants and evidence bases are computationally generated rather than recruited. We position this mode as the sixth column of an established typology of approaches to the future, extending the participatory tradition. This paper empirically evaluates synthetic Delphi panels and characterises the conditions under which they produce reliable forecasts. We deployed a 60-agent panel — six LLM families across ten disciplinary personas — over a Neo4j knowledge graph of 25,823 circular economy publications, testing eight evidence-base configurations: no grounding, full-text and abstract literature, EU regulatory documents, pre-extracted weak signals, and two graph-derived vocabularies (bridge-term injection via class-based TF-IDF and bridge-author traversal). Rankings were validated against observed 2021–2024 publication growth. The panel converged under every condition (CV reductions of 81–91% across three rounds), matching Delphi benchmarks. However, convergence was independent of coverage of the field’s research communities, indicating that agreement among synthetic panellists is not a sufficient validity criterion. Performance was sensitive to the type of grounding : structured bibliometric context substantially outperformed text-based retrieval on coverage, and the two graph-derived configurations achieved the best balance of coverage and ranking accuracy. We close with a reproducible four-step audit-first, deploy-second protocol and design guidelines, supporting synthetic foresight as a viable extension of the participatory tradition contingent on the quality of the knowledge infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Futures Research
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-026-00302-x
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When synthetic Delphi panels work: a graph-native methodology for participatory foresight under structural complexity

Enric Bas, Andrés Fullana, Ana Bossler
European Journal of Futures Research
Delphi Technique in Research
article

When synthetic Delphi panels work: a graph-native methodology for participatory foresight under structural complexity

Enric Bas, Andrés Fullana, Ana Bossler
article en

Abstract

Foresight methodology has historically expanded one mode at a time — from supernatural divination through hermeneutic utopias, technical forecasting, emancipatory foresight, and participatory creative futures. The widespread adoption of large language models opens a sixth mode, synthetic foresight , in which participants and evidence bases are computationally generated rather than recruited. We position this mode as the sixth column of an established typology of approaches to the future, extending the participatory tradition. This paper empirically evaluates synthetic Delphi panels and characterises the conditions under which they produce reliable forecasts. We deployed a 60-agent panel — six LLM families across ten disciplinary personas — over a Neo4j knowledge graph of 25,823 circular economy publications, testing eight evidence-base configurations: no grounding, full-text and abstract literature, EU regulatory documents, pre-extracted weak signals, and two graph-derived vocabularies (bridge-term injection via class-based TF-IDF and bridge-author traversal). Rankings were validated against observed 2021–2024 publication growth. The panel converged under every condition (CV reductions of 81–91% across three rounds), matching Delphi benchmarks. However, convergence was independent of coverage of the field’s research communities, indicating that agreement among synthetic panellists is not a sufficient validity criterion. Performance was sensitive to the type of grounding : structured bibliometric context substantially outperformed text-based retrieval on coverage, and the two graph-derived configurations achieved the best balance of coverage and ranking accuracy. We close with a reproducible four-step audit-first, deploy-second protocol and design guidelines, supporting synthetic foresight as a viable extension of the participatory tradition contingent on the quality of the knowledge infrastructure.

European Journal of Futures ResearchVol. 14(1)
University of Alicante (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.