Nanoimaging, Spectroscopy, and Biosensor Assays for Alternatively Spliced RNA Isoforms in Disease Diagnostics

Abstract Alternative splicing (AS) generates distinct mRNA isoforms, and frequently distinct proteins, from single genes; its dysregulation is established in cancer, neurodegeneration, and immune disease. Sequencing now nominates candidate splice events at scale, but a nominated event does not become a usable measurement until an isoform-discriminating sequence has been converted into a physical signal. Existing AS reviews concentrate on sequencing workflows, computational event calling, or disease catalogs; the assay-engineering step that follows target nomination remains comparatively underserved, and it is where most translational failures occur. This review addresses that gap. We group postsequencing detection into five classes defined by the physical origin of the signal: (i) fixed-tissue in situ localization, (ii) live-cell RNA imaging, (iii) plasmonic and spectroscopic readouts, (iv) label-free nanophotonic biosensing combined with site-specific RNA processing, and (v) protein-level proteogenomic confirmation. These classes are compared on target definition, reported analytical performance, multiplexing, matrix compatibility, perturbation risk, and clinical readiness. The reported performance spans single-copy imaging of splice variants in living cells to label-free detection at 580 fM in under 30 min without cDNA synthesis or PCR. Three conclusions follow. First, assay selection should be governed by the class of claim being made rather than by platform novelty. Second, analytical sensitivity measured on synthetic targets systematically overstates readiness in clinical matrices; therefore, matrix-matched validation is not optional. Third, cross-laboratory comparison is currently obstructed by inconsistent reporting, which we address by proposing a minimum performance-reporting set and explicit platform-selection criteria. We close with emerging directions, including CRISPR-based isoform detection, biosensor integration with nanopore sequencing, AI-assisted probe design, and digital and microfluidic formats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6c07239
Primary Topic
RNA Research and Splicing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nanoimaging, Spectroscopy, and Biosensor Assays for Alternatively Spliced RNA Isoforms in Disease Diagnostics

Ulhas Sopanrao Kadam, Zhongwu Zhou, Joseph Irudayaraj, Jong Chan Hong et al.
ACS Omega
RNA Research and Splicing
article

Nanoimaging, Spectroscopy, and Biosensor Assays for Alternatively Spliced RNA Isoforms in Disease Diagnostics

Ulhas Sopanrao Kadam, Zhongwu Zhou, Joseph Irudayaraj, Jong Chan Hong, Il‐Hoon Cho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Alternative splicing (AS) generates distinct mRNA isoforms, and frequently distinct proteins, from single genes; its dysregulation is established in cancer, neurodegeneration, and immune disease. Sequencing now nominates candidate splice events at scale, but a nominated event does not become a usable measurement until an isoform-discriminating sequence has been converted into a physical signal. Existing AS reviews concentrate on sequencing workflows, computational event calling, or disease catalogs; the assay-engineering step that follows target nomination remains comparatively underserved, and it is where most translational failures occur. This review addresses that gap. We group postsequencing detection into five classes defined by the physical origin of the signal: (i) fixed-tissue in situ localization, (ii) live-cell RNA imaging, (iii) plasmonic and spectroscopic readouts, (iv) label-free nanophotonic biosensing combined with site-specific RNA processing, and (v) protein-level proteogenomic confirmation. These classes are compared on target definition, reported analytical performance, multiplexing, matrix compatibility, perturbation risk, and clinical readiness. The reported performance spans single-copy imaging of splice variants in living cells to label-free detection at 580 fM in under 30 min without cDNA synthesis or PCR. Three conclusions follow. First, assay selection should be governed by the class of claim being made rather than by platform novelty. Second, analytical sensitivity measured on synthetic targets systematically overstates readiness in clinical matrices; therefore, matrix-matched validation is not optional. Third, cross-laboratory comparison is currently obstructed by inconsistent reporting, which we address by proposing a minimum performance-reporting set and explicit platform-selection criteria. We close with emerging directions, including CRISPR-based isoform detection, biosensor integration with nanopore sequencing, AI-assisted probe design, and digital and microfluidic formats.

ACS Omega
Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Gyeongsang National University (KR), Eulji University (KR)
Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
RNA Research and Splicing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.