Productivity and cost estimates for whole-tree timber harvesting systems in the US South

Accurate machine productivity estimates are necessary for timber harvesting cost estimates. Research from the 1980s and 1990s on whole-tree harvesting system productivity may not reflect current equipment performance, while recent research may be too narrowly focused for broader applicability. The objective of this study was to estimate the productivity and cost of whole-tree harvesting machinery operating in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of the US South. Elemental time studies were conducted on wheeled feller-bunchers, grapple skidders, and trailer-mounted knuckleboom loaders operating in seven clearcuts, two first thinnings, and two second thinnings in pine (Pinus spp.) stands, and two hardwood harvests. Machine rate estimates were combined with productivity data to estimate harvesting costs per tonne (t). Regression models were developed to predict cycle time using independent variables such as machine power and skidding distance. Machine productivity on pine clearcuts averaged 82.4, 27.1, and 36.7 t per productive machine hour for the feller-buncher, skidder, and loader, respectively. Onboard truck costs averaged $13.67 t-1 (USD) on pine clearcuts and ranged from $10.99 t-1 on pine second thinnings to $17.42 t-1 on hardwood harvests. Study results can be used to improve the accuracy of harvesting cost estimates and identify opportunities to increase harvesting productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2026-0194
Primary Topic
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Productivity and cost estimates for whole-tree timber harvesting systems in the US South

M. Chad Bolding, Puneet Dwivedi, Joseph L. Conrad IV, Timothy Raymond Miller et al.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
article

Productivity and cost estimates for whole-tree timber harvesting systems in the US South

M. Chad Bolding, Puneet Dwivedi, Joseph L. Conrad IV, Timothy Raymond Miller, Jared E. Beeler
article en

Abstract

Accurate machine productivity estimates are necessary for timber harvesting cost estimates. Research from the 1980s and 1990s on whole-tree harvesting system productivity may not reflect current equipment performance, while recent research may be too narrowly focused for broader applicability. The objective of this study was to estimate the productivity and cost of whole-tree harvesting machinery operating in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of the US South. Elemental time studies were conducted on wheeled feller-bunchers, grapple skidders, and trailer-mounted knuckleboom loaders operating in seven clearcuts, two first thinnings, and two second thinnings in pine (Pinus spp.) stands, and two hardwood harvests. Machine rate estimates were combined with productivity data to estimate harvesting costs per tonne (t). Regression models were developed to predict cycle time using independent variables such as machine power and skidding distance. Machine productivity on pine clearcuts averaged 82.4, 27.1, and 36.7 t per productive machine hour for the feller-buncher, skidder, and loader, respectively. Onboard truck costs averaged $13.67 t-1 (USD) on pine clearcuts and ranged from $10.99 t-1 on pine second thinnings to $17.42 t-1 on hardwood harvests. Study results can be used to improve the accuracy of harvesting cost estimates and identify opportunities to increase harvesting productivity.

Canadian Journal of Forest Research
University of Georgia (US), Clemson University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.