Solar thermal and PV-electric cooking technologies: A comprehensive comparative review of performance, energy storage, application suitability, and sustainability

Solar cooking is increasingly relevant to clean energy access, yet comparison among technologies remains difficult because solar thermal and photovoltaic (PV)-electric systems are often evaluated using different performance boundaries and metrics. This review comparatively assesses five major solar cooking pathways: box-type solar cookers (BTSCs), panel-type SCs (PTSCs), parabolic SCs (PSCs), evacuated-tube SCs (ETSCs), and PV-based solar electric cookers. The concept of performance involves efficiency, temperature capability, cooking capability, speed, cost, portability, energy storage, climate adaptation, and other factors. The performance index of direct solar thermal means is highest for PSC, whose efficiency generally ranges between 60–75% and temperature values of about 300–400°C. The ETSCs combine high efficiency (50–70%) with effective heat storage capabilities, whereas BTSCs and PTSCs remain attractive where simplicity, affordability, and portability dominate. PV-based cookers follow a distinct solar-to-electric-to-heat pathway; reported household systems provide roughly 100–1200 W and enable indoor cooking, precise control, fixed solar collection, and electrical or thermal storage, although overall efficiency and lifecycle cost depend strongly on system architecture. No one technology can be said to be universally better than all others. The best technology depends on the sunlight available, cooking practice, temperature needed, system throughput, food storage needs, infrastructure available, and price. The review outlines the boundary-consistent, application-focused framework necessary to identify and develop further technologies for solar cooking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Exploration & Exploitation
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987261496940
Primary Topic
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solar thermal and PV-electric cooking technologies: A comprehensive comparative review of performance, energy storage, application suitability, and sustainability

Erdem Cüce, Pınar Mert Cuce
Energy Exploration & Exploitation
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
article

Solar thermal and PV-electric cooking technologies: A comprehensive comparative review of performance, energy storage, application suitability, and sustainability

Erdem Cüce, Pınar Mert Cuce
article en

Abstract

Solar cooking is increasingly relevant to clean energy access, yet comparison among technologies remains difficult because solar thermal and photovoltaic (PV)-electric systems are often evaluated using different performance boundaries and metrics. This review comparatively assesses five major solar cooking pathways: box-type solar cookers (BTSCs), panel-type SCs (PTSCs), parabolic SCs (PSCs), evacuated-tube SCs (ETSCs), and PV-based solar electric cookers. The concept of performance involves efficiency, temperature capability, cooking capability, speed, cost, portability, energy storage, climate adaptation, and other factors. The performance index of direct solar thermal means is highest for PSC, whose efficiency generally ranges between 60–75% and temperature values of about 300–400°C. The ETSCs combine high efficiency (50–70%) with effective heat storage capabilities, whereas BTSCs and PTSCs remain attractive where simplicity, affordability, and portability dominate. PV-based cookers follow a distinct solar-to-electric-to-heat pathway; reported household systems provide roughly 100–1200 W and enable indoor cooking, precise control, fixed solar collection, and electrical or thermal storage, although overall efficiency and lifecycle cost depend strongly on system architecture. No one technology can be said to be universally better than all others. The best technology depends on the sunlight available, cooking practice, temperature needed, system throughput, food storage needs, infrastructure available, and price. The review outlines the boundary-consistent, application-focused framework necessary to identify and develop further technologies for solar cooking.

Energy Exploration & Exploitation
Chandigarh University (IN), Istanbul Aydın University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.