Estimating Actual Operational Capacity in Full-Scale Membrane Bioreactors Using a Hydrodynamic Index and Fouling Resistance

Abstract The widespread adoption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology is constrained by high operational expenditures for fouling control. Although research has advanced intelligent control algorithms, practical operation often relies on fixed set points and rule-based logic that do not reveal how much usable capacity remains under changing fouling conditions. This study evaluates an integrated dual-metric framework across three full-scale facilities. The hydrodynamic index (H value) expresses the system-scale operating margin associated with air input, permeate demand, apparent viscosity, solids concentration, and hydraulic resistance, whereas resistance components diagnose the underlying fouling state. Actual capacity (JA) is defined as the flux-equivalent boundary corresponding to a fixed, site-calibrated target H value (HTarget), and the capacity-utilization ratio (CUR = J/JA) compares current demand with this boundary. Across the three facilities, high-fouling-rate events increased from 2.7–4.6% below the capacity boundary to 35.4–56.3% above it. The framework identified flux-driven sensitivity in Plant A, low-flux resistance-state progression in Plant B, and high-stress instability in Plant C. Together, this framework diagnoses whether usable capacity is constrained by hydrodynamic stress, accumulated resistance, or both, and provides a practical basis for selecting appropriate adjustments to flux, aeration, and cleaning to maintain stable membrane performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Engineering
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.6c00628
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Actual Operational Capacity in Full-Scale Membrane Bioreactors Using a Hydrodynamic Index and Fouling Resistance

Changyoon Jun, Glen T. Daigger
ACS ES&T Engineering
Membrane Separation Technologies
article

Estimating Actual Operational Capacity in Full-Scale Membrane Bioreactors Using a Hydrodynamic Index and Fouling Resistance

Changyoon Jun, Glen T. Daigger
article en

Abstract

Abstract The widespread adoption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology is constrained by high operational expenditures for fouling control. Although research has advanced intelligent control algorithms, practical operation often relies on fixed set points and rule-based logic that do not reveal how much usable capacity remains under changing fouling conditions. This study evaluates an integrated dual-metric framework across three full-scale facilities. The hydrodynamic index (H value) expresses the system-scale operating margin associated with air input, permeate demand, apparent viscosity, solids concentration, and hydraulic resistance, whereas resistance components diagnose the underlying fouling state. Actual capacity (JA) is defined as the flux-equivalent boundary corresponding to a fixed, site-calibrated target H value (HTarget), and the capacity-utilization ratio (CUR = J/JA) compares current demand with this boundary. Across the three facilities, high-fouling-rate events increased from 2.7–4.6% below the capacity boundary to 35.4–56.3% above it. The framework identified flux-driven sensitivity in Plant A, low-flux resistance-state progression in Plant B, and high-stress instability in Plant C. Together, this framework diagnoses whether usable capacity is constrained by hydrodynamic stress, accumulated resistance, or both, and provides a practical basis for selecting appropriate adjustments to flux, aeration, and cleaning to maintain stable membrane performance.

ACS ES&T Engineering
University of Michigan (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Membrane Separation Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.