Harmonic Distortion and Distribution Transformer Thermal Risk in Low-Voltage Networks: Feeder Impedance Sensitivity for Sustainable Renewable Energy Integration

The increasing penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs) in low-voltage networks is central to the clean energy transition but introduces coupled challenges in voltage regulation, harmonic distortion, and distribution-transformer operation that impact grid sustainability and asset longevity. This paper isolates feeder impedance as a controlled variable and evaluates whether remote-network power-quality severity and transformer consequence follow the same sensitivity trend. A time-domain model used a factory-matched 200 kVA, 11 kV/420 V Dyn11 transformer with 40% DER connected at remote Node S3. The DER current contained prescribed fifth, seventh, eleventh, and thirteenth harmonics, while the LV feeder resistance and inductance were co-scaled from 0.5 to 2.0 pu. Across the DER-connected sweep, Node S3 line-to-line RMS voltage increased from 420.45 V to 428.95 V, and the voltage-rise magnitude increased from 3.03 V to 11.55 V. Selected-order Node S3 VTHD increased monotonically from 1.104% to 1.395%. Baseline-corrected harmonic transfer impedance also increased at every assessed harmonic, supporting a feeder-impedance-driven voltage-response mechanism. In contrast, transformer loading remained within 14.44–14.52%, total transformer loss within 350.26–350.93 W, hot-spot temperature within 38.229–38.246 °C, and common-baseline relative aging within 0.2863–0.2871. The results demonstrate that feeder weakness can materially increase remote-node voltage and harmonic sensitivity without producing a corresponding increase in transformer thermal severity. Network voltage response and transformer consequence should therefore be assessed as related but non-equivalent engineering domains. By separating power quality management from transformer thermal risk, distribution utilities can avoid premature asset replacement, enabling targeted, resource-efficient investments that support sustainable grid planning and long-term renewable integration (SDG 7 and SDG 9).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182010503
Primary Topic
Power Quality and Harmonics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmonic Distortion and Distribution Transformer Thermal Risk in Low-Voltage Networks: Feeder Impedance Sensitivity for Sustainable Renewable Energy Integration

Mohamed Fayaz Khan, Andrew Graham Swanson, Francis Bennie
Sustainability
Power Quality and Harmonics
article

Harmonic Distortion and Distribution Transformer Thermal Risk in Low-Voltage Networks: Feeder Impedance Sensitivity for Sustainable Renewable Energy Integration

Mohamed Fayaz Khan, Andrew Graham Swanson, Francis Bennie
article en

Abstract

The increasing penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs) in low-voltage networks is central to the clean energy transition but introduces coupled challenges in voltage regulation, harmonic distortion, and distribution-transformer operation that impact grid sustainability and asset longevity. This paper isolates feeder impedance as a controlled variable and evaluates whether remote-network power-quality severity and transformer consequence follow the same sensitivity trend. A time-domain model used a factory-matched 200 kVA, 11 kV/420 V Dyn11 transformer with 40% DER connected at remote Node S3. The DER current contained prescribed fifth, seventh, eleventh, and thirteenth harmonics, while the LV feeder resistance and inductance were co-scaled from 0.5 to 2.0 pu. Across the DER-connected sweep, Node S3 line-to-line RMS voltage increased from 420.45 V to 428.95 V, and the voltage-rise magnitude increased from 3.03 V to 11.55 V. Selected-order Node S3 VTHD increased monotonically from 1.104% to 1.395%. Baseline-corrected harmonic transfer impedance also increased at every assessed harmonic, supporting a feeder-impedance-driven voltage-response mechanism. In contrast, transformer loading remained within 14.44–14.52%, total transformer loss within 350.26–350.93 W, hot-spot temperature within 38.229–38.246 °C, and common-baseline relative aging within 0.2863–0.2871. The results demonstrate that feeder weakness can materially increase remote-node voltage and harmonic sensitivity without producing a corresponding increase in transformer thermal severity. Network voltage response and transformer consequence should therefore be assessed as related but non-equivalent engineering domains. By separating power quality management from transformer thermal risk, distribution utilities can avoid premature asset replacement, enabling targeted, resource-efficient investments that support sustainable grid planning and long-term renewable integration (SDG 7 and SDG 9).

SustainabilityVol. 18(20)
Stellenbosch University (ZA), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Power Quality and Harmonics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.