Comparing Nuclear Reaction Coordinates Driving Photoinduced Proton-Coupled Electron and Energy Transfer

Abstract Proton transfer is coupled to electron transfer or electronic excitation energy transfer in proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) and proton-coupled energy transfer (PCEnT) reactions, respectively. Although photoinduced PCET and PCEnT have been studied extensively in anthracene–phenol–pyridine molecular triads, the nuclear reaction coordinates for these two pathways are still unknown. Herein, we identify the nuclear reaction coordinates for PCET and PCEnT in the triads by sampling the seam space between the relevant intersecting diabatic states. The reaction coordinate has contributions mainly from anthracene and phenol for PCET but involves the entire triad, including pyridine, for PCEnT. Both reaction coordinates involve motions related to contraction of the phenol C–O bond as well as motions within the anthracene rings that differ for PCET and PCEnT due to different charge distributions. The proton acceptor motion contributes more to the PCEnT than the PCET reaction coordinate. Both PCET and PCEnT reactions are concerted in that there is no stable intermediate, but they are both most likely asynchronous. Our analysis also suggests that PCET proceeds through a conical intersection in its minimum energy pathway, whereas PCEnT moves through an avoided crossing. The quantum mechanical treatment of the transferring proton within a vibronically nonadiabatic framework suggests that the kinetic isotope effect may be greater for PCEnT than for PCET, although more extensive calculations are required for confirmation. Understanding the fundamental similarities and differences between PCET and PCEnT mechanisms will help guide the design of proton-coupled systems that favor either charge transfer or energy transfer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6c15580
Primary Topic
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Nuclear Reaction Coordinates Driving Photoinduced Proton-Coupled Electron and Energy Transfer

D. Vale Cofer-Shabica, Sharon Hammes‐Schiffer, Joseph Eli Subotnik, Kai Cui et al.
2 links
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
article

Comparing Nuclear Reaction Coordinates Driving Photoinduced Proton-Coupled Electron and Energy Transfer

D. Vale Cofer-Shabica, Sharon Hammes‐Schiffer, Joseph Eli Subotnik, Kai Cui, A. P. Ghosh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Proton transfer is coupled to electron transfer or electronic excitation energy transfer in proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) and proton-coupled energy transfer (PCEnT) reactions, respectively. Although photoinduced PCET and PCEnT have been studied extensively in anthracene–phenol–pyridine molecular triads, the nuclear reaction coordinates for these two pathways are still unknown. Herein, we identify the nuclear reaction coordinates for PCET and PCEnT in the triads by sampling the seam space between the relevant intersecting diabatic states. The reaction coordinate has contributions mainly from anthracene and phenol for PCET but involves the entire triad, including pyridine, for PCEnT. Both reaction coordinates involve motions related to contraction of the phenol C–O bond as well as motions within the anthracene rings that differ for PCET and PCEnT due to different charge distributions. The proton acceptor motion contributes more to the PCEnT than the PCET reaction coordinate. Both PCET and PCEnT reactions are concerted in that there is no stable intermediate, but they are both most likely asynchronous. Our analysis also suggests that PCET proceeds through a conical intersection in its minimum energy pathway, whereas PCEnT moves through an avoided crossing. The quantum mechanical treatment of the transferring proton within a vibronically nonadiabatic framework suggests that the kinetic isotope effect may be greater for PCEnT than for PCET, although more extensive calculations are required for confirmation. Understanding the fundamental similarities and differences between PCET and PCEnT mechanisms will help guide the design of proton-coupled systems that favor either charge transfer or energy transfer.

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Princeton University (US)
Division of Chemistry, National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon