Measurement of contextual factors in clinical practice and research: development of an expert-informed toolkit

Contextual factors (CFs) can influence therapeutic encounters and clinical outcomes, yet their measurement remains fragmented, lacking a unified framework to guide tool selection. To identify, appraise, and synthesize CF measurement instruments into an expert-informed clinical toolkit and identify current measurement gaps. An international panel of 15 experts evaluated 227 instruments across five domains (patient/practitioner characteristics, relational dynamics, environment, and treatment) using a hybrid COSMIN-informed appraisal design. Instruments were screened for content validity and psychometric robustness. Twenty instruments were selected for inclusion in the toolkit. Despite identifying high-quality instruments for stable traits, our analysis revealed critical measurement gaps in dynamic, state-responsive processes. Specifically, there is an absence of validated, clinically feasible tools for capturing real-time clinician affective states, non-verbal synchrony, therapeutic touch, and moment-to-moment environmental or procedural interactions. This study provides the first expert-informed framework for assessing CFs. Future research should prioritize developing state-responsive instruments capable of capturing these dynamic elements as they unfold in real-world settings to better understand the contextual drivers of recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-72540-9
Primary Topic
Health Education and Validation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement of contextual factors in clinical practice and research: development of an expert-informed toolkit

Jennifer A. Bent, Amy W. McDevitt, Joel E. Bialosky, Elisa Carlino et al.
Scientific Reports
Health Education and Validation
article

Measurement of contextual factors in clinical practice and research: development of an expert-informed toolkit

Jennifer A. Bent, Amy W. McDevitt, Joel E. Bialosky, Elisa Carlino, Luana Colloca, Alessandra Garcia, Jorge Eduardo Esteves, Antoine Bailliard, Alvisa Palese, Giacomo Rossettini, Vitaly Napadow, Felicity L. Bishop, William R Reed, David Newell, Chad E. Cook
article en

Abstract

Contextual factors (CFs) can influence therapeutic encounters and clinical outcomes, yet their measurement remains fragmented, lacking a unified framework to guide tool selection. To identify, appraise, and synthesize CF measurement instruments into an expert-informed clinical toolkit and identify current measurement gaps. An international panel of 15 experts evaluated 227 instruments across five domains (patient/practitioner characteristics, relational dynamics, environment, and treatment) using a hybrid COSMIN-informed appraisal design. Instruments were screened for content validity and psychometric robustness. Twenty instruments were selected for inclusion in the toolkit. Despite identifying high-quality instruments for stable traits, our analysis revealed critical measurement gaps in dynamic, state-responsive processes. Specifically, there is an absence of validated, clinically feasible tools for capturing real-time clinician affective states, non-verbal synchrony, therapeutic touch, and moment-to-moment environmental or procedural interactions. This study provides the first expert-informed framework for assessing CFs. Future research should prioritize developing state-responsive instruments capable of capturing these dynamic elements as they unfold in real-world settings to better understand the contextual drivers of recovery.

Scientific Reports
University of Verona (IT), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Udine (IT), Campbell University (US), Harvard University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Duke University (US), University of Florida Health (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of Florida (US), Brooks Rehabilitation Clinical Research Center (US), Duke University Health System (US), Ospedale San Giuseppe (IT), Duke University Hospital (US), University of Southampton (GB), Escola Superior de Saúde Atlântica, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Turin (IT), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES), Bournemouth University (GB)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Education and Validation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.