Impacts of the iCanCope Digital Pain Self-Management Program Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

iCanCope™ (ICC) is a digital self-management program for 15–25 year olds with chronic pain. This study evaluated program satisfaction and efficacy through a two arm randomized controlled trial in Canadian tertiary care pain clinics. Participants were randomized to receive either ICC (app and website with symptom tracking and trending, pain education, goal setting, library, community forum) or an identically branded active control program with limited features. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, postprogram (2 months; T2), and follow-up (6 months; T3). Satisfaction was assessed using the Acceptability eScale and qualitatively with a subset of intervention participants. Linear mixed effects models characterized treatment effects on primary (pain interference) and secondary outcomes. Of 302 enrolled participants, 297 were analyzed (mean age = 17.1 ± 2.4, 83% female). Outcome completion rates were 89% at T2 and 71% at T3. Program acceptability was high in both the intervention (33.9 ± 7.0) and control group (32.7 ± 6.8). Most participants exhibited moderate to high engagement with daily checkins (intervention: 79%, active control: 80%). No significant treatment effects were found. However, improvements across time in pain interference at T2 (β = −0.58, p < .001) and T3 (β = −0.64, p = .0016) and improvements in knowledge about managing pain at T2 (β = −0.54, p < .0001) and T3 (β = −1.04, p < .0001) were found for both groups. Most (15/16) interviewees reported that ICC enhanced their confidence and/or ability to engage in pain self-management. Digitally mediated symptom tracking and trending and pain education is engaging and beneficial for 15–25 year olds with chronic pain. Use of an active-control may have diminished the ability to detect treatment-group effects. ICC has been translated to French-Canadian and publicly released as a free self-management tool. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02601755

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Pain
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2026.2717605
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of the iCanCope Digital Pain Self-Management Program Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sarah Brennenstuhl, Lori S. Montgomery, Fareha Nishat, Krista Baerg et al.
Canadian Journal of Pain
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

Impacts of the iCanCope Digital Pain Self-Management Program Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sarah Brennenstuhl, Lori S. Montgomery, Fareha Nishat, Krista Baerg, Jill Mac Laren Chorney, Rachel Kelly, Tania Di Renna, Karim Mukhida, Carley Ouellette, Bruce D. Dick, Ramesh Zacharias, Chitra Lalloo, Vina Mohabir, Patricia A. Poulin, Mark K. Simmonds, Quỳnh Phạm, Cleo Davies-Chalmers, Fiona A. Campbell, Lauren Harris, Jennifer Nan Stinson, Melanie E. Noel, Tonya Palermo, Brenna McDermott, Joe Cafazzo
article en

Abstract

iCanCope™ (ICC) is a digital self-management program for 15–25 year olds with chronic pain. This study evaluated program satisfaction and efficacy through a two arm randomized controlled trial in Canadian tertiary care pain clinics. Participants were randomized to receive either ICC (app and website with symptom tracking and trending, pain education, goal setting, library, community forum) or an identically branded active control program with limited features. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, postprogram (2 months; T2), and follow-up (6 months; T3). Satisfaction was assessed using the Acceptability eScale and qualitatively with a subset of intervention participants. Linear mixed effects models characterized treatment effects on primary (pain interference) and secondary outcomes. Of 302 enrolled participants, 297 were analyzed (mean age = 17.1 ± 2.4, 83% female). Outcome completion rates were 89% at T2 and 71% at T3. Program acceptability was high in both the intervention (33.9 ± 7.0) and control group (32.7 ± 6.8). Most participants exhibited moderate to high engagement with daily checkins (intervention: 79%, active control: 80%). No significant treatment effects were found. However, improvements across time in pain interference at T2 (β = −0.58, p < .001) and T3 (β = −0.64, p = .0016) and improvements in knowledge about managing pain at T2 (β = −0.54, p < .0001) and T3 (β = −1.04, p < .0001) were found for both groups. Most (15/16) interviewees reported that ICC enhanced their confidence and/or ability to engage in pain self-management. Digitally mediated symptom tracking and trending and pain education is engaging and beneficial for 15–25 year olds with chronic pain. Use of an active-control may have diminished the ability to detect treatment-group effects. ICC has been translated to French-Canadian and publicly released as a free self-management tool. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02601755

Canadian Journal of PainVol. 10(1)
Dalhousie University (CA), University Health Network (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), University of Washington (US), Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), Seattle Children's Research Institute (US), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.