External Factors Influencing Software Developer Behavior and Their Contribution to Software Errors: A Phenomenological Study

This study investigates external factors shaping software developer behavior and predisposing them to introduce errors, an area receiving limited scholarly attention compared to technical root causes of defects.Software defects persist despite advances in development tooling, process maturity, and automated quality assurance.This study draws on the Technology-Organization-Environment framework to explore the organizational and environmental conditions underlying defect introduction.A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted with 15 professional software developers in the United States, each with 5 or more years of cross-domain experience.Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed by six-stage thematic analysis.Seven thematic categories of external influence were identified: (T1) time constraints and dynamic requirements, (T2) communication barriers and team dependencies, (T3) knowledge gaps and testing strategies, (T4) resource constraints and industry awareness, (T5) development modalities and architecture, (T6) legacy systems, infrastructure, and security, and (T7) financial constraints and leadership vision.A total of 112 coded comments were reported, theme T1 was raised by 11 of 15 participants (73.3%) with 42 references and this was the major reported theme, followed by themes T3 and T4 reported by 8 participants (53.3%) with 15 and 10 references.Theme T2 was identified by 7 participants (46.7%) with 18 references.Theme T5 was identified by 6 participants (40%) with 11 references and theme T7 was identified by 5 participants (33.3%) with 11 references.Theme T6 was least identified with 5 references by 4 participants (26.7%).Beyond their relative frequency, these counts indicate the breadth of concerns across participants rather than a ranking of causal importance.The themes collectively describe how organizational and environmental conditions, rather than individual counts alone, shape developers' experience of error introduction.The study provides an integrated, evidence-based account of external pressures leading developers to introduce defects, extending prior research on organizational drivers of software quality.Software defect introduction is substantially shaped by organizational and environmental conditions rather than individual developer capability alone, requiring systemic responses from organizations to improve software reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus Journal of Computer Science.
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/s44389-026-00326-1
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External Factors Influencing Software Developer Behavior and Their Contribution to Software Errors: A Phenomenological Study

James C. Hyatt, Rahul Azmeera
Cureus Journal of Computer Science.
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
article

External Factors Influencing Software Developer Behavior and Their Contribution to Software Errors: A Phenomenological Study

James C. Hyatt, Rahul Azmeera
article en

Abstract

This study investigates external factors shaping software developer behavior and predisposing them to introduce errors, an area receiving limited scholarly attention compared to technical root causes of defects.Software defects persist despite advances in development tooling, process maturity, and automated quality assurance.This study draws on the Technology-Organization-Environment framework to explore the organizational and environmental conditions underlying defect introduction.A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted with 15 professional software developers in the United States, each with 5 or more years of cross-domain experience.Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed by six-stage thematic analysis.Seven thematic categories of external influence were identified: (T1) time constraints and dynamic requirements, (T2) communication barriers and team dependencies, (T3) knowledge gaps and testing strategies, (T4) resource constraints and industry awareness, (T5) development modalities and architecture, (T6) legacy systems, infrastructure, and security, and (T7) financial constraints and leadership vision.A total of 112 coded comments were reported, theme T1 was raised by 11 of 15 participants (73.3%) with 42 references and this was the major reported theme, followed by themes T3 and T4 reported by 8 participants (53.3%) with 15 and 10 references.Theme T2 was identified by 7 participants (46.7%) with 18 references.Theme T5 was identified by 6 participants (40%) with 11 references and theme T7 was identified by 5 participants (33.3%) with 11 references.Theme T6 was least identified with 5 references by 4 participants (26.7%).Beyond their relative frequency, these counts indicate the breadth of concerns across participants rather than a ranking of causal importance.The themes collectively describe how organizational and environmental conditions, rather than individual counts alone, shape developers' experience of error introduction.The study provides an integrated, evidence-based account of external pressures leading developers to introduce defects, extending prior research on organizational drivers of software quality.Software defect introduction is substantially shaped by organizational and environmental conditions rather than individual developer capability alone, requiring systemic responses from organizations to improve software reliability.

Cureus Journal of Computer Science.
University of the Cumberlands (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.