Microcirculatory Hemodynamic Changes on Full Support Microaxial Flow Pump in Cardiogenic Shock

Impaired microcirculation predicts mortality in cardiogenic shock independent of systemic hemodynamics, yet current treatment strategies focus primarily on restoring macrocirculatory markers. We studied whether full-support microaxial flow pump (mAFP) therapy improves sublingual microcirculation in cardiogenic shock. A prospective, single-arm, observational study of serial sublingual microcirculation imaging via incident darkfield handheld videomicroscopy was performed in 18 cardiogenic shock patients undergoing Impella 5.5 (mAFP) placement. Microvascular flow index (MFI), microvascular heterogeneity index (MHI), proportion of perfused vessels (PPV), and perfused vessel density (PVD) were measured. Eighteen patients were enrolled. Microvascular flow index (p = 0.004), MHI (p = 0.055), PPV (p = 0.003), and PVD (p = 0.067) improved immediately on support, including when adjusted for vasoactive-inotropic score. Improvement in MFI, MHI, PPV, or PVD was most pronounced in those with impaired baseline microcirculatory hemodynamics (all p < 0.05), whereas those with preserved baseline values demonstrated no change. Improved agreement between systemic and microcirculatory hemodynamics was observed in association with mAFP support, and none experienced worsening microcirculatory function. These exploratory findings suggest full-support mAFPs may improve impaired microcirculation during cardiogenic shock, although device-specific effects cannot be isolated from overall clinical improvement; validation in larger studies is warranted. Although agreement between systemic and microcirculatory hemodynamic markers improved, no macrohemodynamic marker proved sufficient to ensure adequate microcirculatory perfusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002879
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microcirculatory Hemodynamic Changes on Full Support Microaxial Flow Pump in Cardiogenic Shock

Aditya G. Parikh, Joyce Wanglee Wald, James W. Schurr, Mauer Biscotti et al.
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Microcirculatory Hemodynamic Changes on Full Support Microaxial Flow Pump in Cardiogenic Shock

Aditya G. Parikh, Joyce Wanglee Wald, James W. Schurr, Mauer Biscotti, Tayyab Shah, Marisa Cevasco, Alyson N. Brown, John C. Greenwood, Jacob Niculcea, The Micro-C-Shock Investigators
article en

Abstract

Impaired microcirculation predicts mortality in cardiogenic shock independent of systemic hemodynamics, yet current treatment strategies focus primarily on restoring macrocirculatory markers. We studied whether full-support microaxial flow pump (mAFP) therapy improves sublingual microcirculation in cardiogenic shock. A prospective, single-arm, observational study of serial sublingual microcirculation imaging via incident darkfield handheld videomicroscopy was performed in 18 cardiogenic shock patients undergoing Impella 5.5 (mAFP) placement. Microvascular flow index (MFI), microvascular heterogeneity index (MHI), proportion of perfused vessels (PPV), and perfused vessel density (PVD) were measured. Eighteen patients were enrolled. Microvascular flow index (p = 0.004), MHI (p = 0.055), PPV (p = 0.003), and PVD (p = 0.067) improved immediately on support, including when adjusted for vasoactive-inotropic score. Improvement in MFI, MHI, PPV, or PVD was most pronounced in those with impaired baseline microcirculatory hemodynamics (all p < 0.05), whereas those with preserved baseline values demonstrated no change. Improved agreement between systemic and microcirculatory hemodynamics was observed in association with mAFP support, and none experienced worsening microcirculatory function. These exploratory findings suggest full-support mAFPs may improve impaired microcirculation during cardiogenic shock, although device-specific effects cannot be isolated from overall clinical improvement; validation in larger studies is warranted. Although agreement between systemic and microcirculatory hemodynamic markers improved, no macrohemodynamic marker proved sufficient to ensure adequate microcirculatory perfusion.

ASAIO Journal
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.