Towards ethical, co-produced and justice-oriented research with small-scale fishing communities: a multi-scalar call to action

Small-scale fisheries underpin food security, livelihoods and cultural identity for hundreds of millions of people worldwide, yet remain marginalised within dominant ocean governance and research agendas. Recent shifts toward justice-, equity- and rights-based approaches in ocean governance and policy signal important progress, but their rapid uptake risks remaining largely rhetorical if not grounded in meaningful changes to research practice. This paper draws on the experiential knowledge of researchers working across diverse geographical and institutional contexts to critically examine the structural conditions that shape research with small-scale fishing communities. We identify seven tensions that are recurring and cross-cutting within funding architectures, institutional incentive systems, and global policy agendas that constrain the ability of researchers to conduct ethical, co-produced and justice-oriented work. These include misalignments between global priorities and local realities, knowledge hierarchies, rigid funding models, and academic metrics that undervalue relational and collaborative processes. In response, we propose six principles to enable and guide more equitable research practices with small-scale fishing communities. We emphasise the need for the recognition of diverse knowledge systems and creative outputs, institutional reforms that value long-term partnerships and local impact, and strengthened training in reflexive and ethical research approaches. Framed as a multi-scalar call to action, this paper highlights the shared responsibilities of research funders, academic institutions, policy agencies, NGOs, and researchers in reshaping the systems that govern knowledge production that inform ocean governance. Advancing ocean sustainability requires not only new ideas but structural transformation to ensure that research with small-scale fishing communities is inclusive, accountable and just.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Policy
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107322
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards ethical, co-produced and justice-oriented research with small-scale fishing communities: a multi-scalar call to action

Ingrid E. van Putten, Amy Diedrich, Nathan James Bennett, Bethany Smith et al.
Marine Policy
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Towards ethical, co-produced and justice-oriented research with small-scale fishing communities: a multi-scalar call to action

Ingrid E. van Putten, Amy Diedrich, Nathan James Bennett, Bethany Smith, Annemie R. Janssen, Joe Duggan, Pita Neihapi, Dirk J. Steenbergen, Annette Breckwoldt, Vítor Renck, Michael Fabinyi, Stefan Partelow, Amanda Schadeberg, Kate Barclay, Ella‐Kari Muhl, Clara Obregón, Jessica L. Blythe, Vera Horigue, Christopher Cvitanovic, Mia Strand, Raymond K. Ayilu, Joshua E. Cinner, Leandra R. Gonçalves
article en

Abstract

Small-scale fisheries underpin food security, livelihoods and cultural identity for hundreds of millions of people worldwide, yet remain marginalised within dominant ocean governance and research agendas. Recent shifts toward justice-, equity- and rights-based approaches in ocean governance and policy signal important progress, but their rapid uptake risks remaining largely rhetorical if not grounded in meaningful changes to research practice. This paper draws on the experiential knowledge of researchers working across diverse geographical and institutional contexts to critically examine the structural conditions that shape research with small-scale fishing communities. We identify seven tensions that are recurring and cross-cutting within funding architectures, institutional incentive systems, and global policy agendas that constrain the ability of researchers to conduct ethical, co-produced and justice-oriented work. These include misalignments between global priorities and local realities, knowledge hierarchies, rigid funding models, and academic metrics that undervalue relational and collaborative processes. In response, we propose six principles to enable and guide more equitable research practices with small-scale fishing communities. We emphasise the need for the recognition of diverse knowledge systems and creative outputs, institutional reforms that value long-term partnerships and local impact, and strengthened training in reflexive and ethical research approaches. Framed as a multi-scalar call to action, this paper highlights the shared responsibilities of research funders, academic institutions, policy agencies, NGOs, and researchers in reshaping the systems that govern knowledge production that inform ocean governance. Advancing ocean sustainability requires not only new ideas but structural transformation to ensure that research with small-scale fishing communities is inclusive, accountable and just.

Marine PolicyVol. 196
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, European Research Council, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Life below water, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.