Expansions in scope of practice provider regulations for certified nurse midwives & maternal-infant health outcomes: evidence from PRAMS

Abstract Growing shortages in women’s health care providers can delay prenatal care, increasing risks for both mothers and infants. To address this, many states have expanded regulations on non-physician practice authority, allowing certified nurse midwives to deliver a wider range of services, independent of direct physician supervision. Supporters argue that these expansions can help fill provider gaps and improve access to early prenatal care. Critics question whether the quality of care might decline without physician oversight. Despite growing policy interest, there is limited evidence on how independent practice affects maternal and infant health. This study examines the impact of practice reforms for Certified Nurse Midwives on health outcomes with data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that regulatory expansions in the autonomy of Certified Nurse Midwives lead to earlier prenatal care without negatively affecting birth outcomes. Our findings suggest that regulatory flexibility can improve access to care without compromising quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regulatory Economics
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-026-09527-x
Primary Topic
Nursing Roles and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expansions in scope of practice provider regulations for certified nurse midwives & maternal-infant health outcomes: evidence from PRAMS

Alicia Plemmons, Sriparna Ghosh, Agnitra Roy Choudhury
Journal of Regulatory Economics
Nursing Roles and Practices
article

Expansions in scope of practice provider regulations for certified nurse midwives & maternal-infant health outcomes: evidence from PRAMS

Alicia Plemmons, Sriparna Ghosh, Agnitra Roy Choudhury
article en

Abstract

Abstract Growing shortages in women’s health care providers can delay prenatal care, increasing risks for both mothers and infants. To address this, many states have expanded regulations on non-physician practice authority, allowing certified nurse midwives to deliver a wider range of services, independent of direct physician supervision. Supporters argue that these expansions can help fill provider gaps and improve access to early prenatal care. Critics question whether the quality of care might decline without physician oversight. Despite growing policy interest, there is limited evidence on how independent practice affects maternal and infant health. This study examines the impact of practice reforms for Certified Nurse Midwives on health outcomes with data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that regulatory expansions in the autonomy of Certified Nurse Midwives lead to earlier prenatal care without negatively affecting birth outcomes. Our findings suggest that regulatory flexibility can improve access to care without compromising quality.

Journal of Regulatory EconomicsVol. 69(1)
West Virginia University (US), Morgantown High School (US), Auburn University at Montgomery (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Nursing Roles and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.