Dynamic Response of a Suction-Caisson Foundation-Structure System through Numerical Simulations and Model Testing

Abstract Suction caissons are widely recognized as a preferred foundation solution for both subsea structures and wind farms. Yet, the seismic performance of these systems is often not fully captured. Typically, analyses focus solely on foundation capacity by applying a quasi-static acceleration, which overlooks the crucial inertial interactions between the structure and the surrounding soil. A thorough design verification analysis should rigorously document the complete motion of the unit as well as the dynamic response of piping and other equipment on the unit and of any external pipes connected to it. The work described in this paper is the earthquake design verification performed for a four-caisson-supported manifold at the Shah Deniz field in the Caspian Sea. The work also included documentation of the earthquake performance of the jumper pipes and spool pipes connected to the manifold at one end and to the single wells and flowline termination assembly in the other end. Detailed finite-element time series analyses were performed accounting for interaction between the soil and the manifold structure. The soil model consisted of nonlinear springs accounting for hysteretic loading–unloading features. The development of this model was supported by large centrifuge tests. Earthquake time-history motions were applied at the far end of the springs. Examples of the resulting manifolds global motions are presented in this paper. The manifold structure as such is robust in resisting the earthquake motions. The main concern is related to piping and other dynamically sensitive equipment. In this paper, examples of the separate analyses performed for jumper and spool pipes are described, including modeling of soil resistance and earthquake input motions. The main features of the response, such as displacements, accelerations, and forces at different locations, are described and presented in the paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jggefk.gteng-14662
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Response of a Suction-Caisson Foundation-Structure System through Numerical Simulations and Model Testing

Jens Bergan-Haavik, Andreas Aaslid, Jørn Hennig, Knut Arnesen et al.
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Dynamic Response of a Suction-Caisson Foundation-Structure System through Numerical Simulations and Model Testing

Jens Bergan-Haavik, Andreas Aaslid, Jørn Hennig, Knut Arnesen, Stephen Kulleseid, Siamak Feizi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Suction caissons are widely recognized as a preferred foundation solution for both subsea structures and wind farms. Yet, the seismic performance of these systems is often not fully captured. Typically, analyses focus solely on foundation capacity by applying a quasi-static acceleration, which overlooks the crucial inertial interactions between the structure and the surrounding soil. A thorough design verification analysis should rigorously document the complete motion of the unit as well as the dynamic response of piping and other equipment on the unit and of any external pipes connected to it. The work described in this paper is the earthquake design verification performed for a four-caisson-supported manifold at the Shah Deniz field in the Caspian Sea. The work also included documentation of the earthquake performance of the jumper pipes and spool pipes connected to the manifold at one end and to the single wells and flowline termination assembly in the other end. Detailed finite-element time series analyses were performed accounting for interaction between the soil and the manifold structure. The soil model consisted of nonlinear springs accounting for hysteretic loading–unloading features. The development of this model was supported by large centrifuge tests. Earthquake time-history motions were applied at the far end of the springs. Examples of the resulting manifolds global motions are presented in this paper. The manifold structure as such is robust in resisting the earthquake motions. The main concern is related to piping and other dynamically sensitive equipment. In this paper, examples of the separate analyses performed for jumper and spool pipes are described, including modeling of soil resistance and earthquake input motions. The main features of the response, such as displacements, accelerations, and forces at different locations, are described and presented in the paper.

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental EngineeringVol. 152(12)
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO), DNV (Norway) (NO), TechnipFMC (France) (FR), TechnipFMC (United States) (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.