Information avoidance and uncomfortable knowledge: conceptualizing responses to the wicked problem of GenAI

Purpose This conceptual article examines wicked problems as information problems that have the potential to (1) contribute to information avoidance and (2) produce uncomfortable knowledge. It aims to bridge a gap in information science by integrating these three constructs to explain polarized individual and institutional responses, using the example of generative AI (GenAI). Design/methodology/approach Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from planning, social science and human information behavior, the study develops a unifying macro–meso–micro framework. GenAI is used as an illustrative case to demonstrate how wicked problem characteristics generate uncertainty, which in turn has the potential to trigger avoidance behaviors across levels and produce uncomfortable knowledge. Findings At the micro level, individuals avoid information as an adaptive response to affective discomfort and uncertainty. At the meso level, institutions respond through strategies such as denial, dismissal, diversion and displacement. Using the example of GenAI, these dynamics reinforce polarized, all-or-nothing responses, despite its inherent complexity. Research limitations/implications As a conceptual study, the framework requires empirical testing across contexts to validate relationships among levels. Originality/value This article offers a novel conceptual integration of wicked problems, information avoidance and uncomfortable knowledge within a single framework. It advances understanding of information avoidance as a strategic, multi-level response to complex information environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Documentation
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2026-0383
Primary Topic
Information Science and Libraries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information avoidance and uncomfortable knowledge: conceptualizing responses to the wicked problem of GenAI

Heather Lea Moulaison, Heather Thach
Journal of Documentation
Information Science and Libraries
article

Information avoidance and uncomfortable knowledge: conceptualizing responses to the wicked problem of GenAI

Heather Lea Moulaison, Heather Thach
article en

Abstract

Purpose This conceptual article examines wicked problems as information problems that have the potential to (1) contribute to information avoidance and (2) produce uncomfortable knowledge. It aims to bridge a gap in information science by integrating these three constructs to explain polarized individual and institutional responses, using the example of generative AI (GenAI). Design/methodology/approach Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from planning, social science and human information behavior, the study develops a unifying macro–meso–micro framework. GenAI is used as an illustrative case to demonstrate how wicked problem characteristics generate uncertainty, which in turn has the potential to trigger avoidance behaviors across levels and produce uncomfortable knowledge. Findings At the micro level, individuals avoid information as an adaptive response to affective discomfort and uncertainty. At the meso level, institutions respond through strategies such as denial, dismissal, diversion and displacement. Using the example of GenAI, these dynamics reinforce polarized, all-or-nothing responses, despite its inherent complexity. Research limitations/implications As a conceptual study, the framework requires empirical testing across contexts to validate relationships among levels. Originality/value This article offers a novel conceptual integration of wicked problems, information avoidance and uncomfortable knowledge within a single framework. It advances understanding of information avoidance as a strategic, multi-level response to complex information environments.

Journal of Documentation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Information Science and Libraries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.