Experimental evaluation of the effect of the feed bowl design on the eating behavior of domestic cats in the context of whisker stress

Aim of the study. To evaluate the effect of feed bowl design on the eating behavior of domestic cats with emphasis on the phenomenon of whisker stress. Materials and methods. A prospective within-subject study with sequential exposure to two feeding conditions was conducted in 26 clinically healthy domestic cats. Animals were sequentially fed from a standard deep narrow bowl (control) and a wide shallow bowl (experiment) with a 3-day adaptation period. The following parameters were recorded: amount of feed consumed, amount of dropped feed, number of approaches to the bowl, presence of pauses and attempts to extract feed with a paw. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Fisher's exact test and binomial test. Results. No statistically significant differences in feed consumption were found between the two conditions (p > 0,05). When using the wide shallow bowl, no feed dropping was observed (0%), whereas when feeding from the standard bowl, dropping occurred in 38,5% of cats (p < 0,05). In the preference test, cats did not show a preference for either bowl (p > 0,05). Behavioral markers of sensory discomfort were not recorded. Conclusions. Bowl design affects feeding ergonomics and the amount of spilled feed but does not confirm the existence of whisker stress as a systemic phenomenon in domestic cats. Recommendations for the use of wide bowls may be justified by practical considerations of convenience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian veterinary journal
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32416/2500-4379-2026-4-18-23
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental evaluation of the effect of the feed bowl design on the eating behavior of domestic cats in the context of whisker stress

А.Н. Овчарова, Tat'yana Maslennikova, Vera Maslennikova
Russian veterinary journal
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Experimental evaluation of the effect of the feed bowl design on the eating behavior of domestic cats in the context of whisker stress

А.Н. Овчарова, Tat'yana Maslennikova, Vera Maslennikova
article en

Abstract

Aim of the study. To evaluate the effect of feed bowl design on the eating behavior of domestic cats with emphasis on the phenomenon of whisker stress. Materials and methods. A prospective within-subject study with sequential exposure to two feeding conditions was conducted in 26 clinically healthy domestic cats. Animals were sequentially fed from a standard deep narrow bowl (control) and a wide shallow bowl (experiment) with a 3-day adaptation period. The following parameters were recorded: amount of feed consumed, amount of dropped feed, number of approaches to the bowl, presence of pauses and attempts to extract feed with a paw. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Fisher's exact test and binomial test. Results. No statistically significant differences in feed consumption were found between the two conditions (p > 0,05). When using the wide shallow bowl, no feed dropping was observed (0%), whereas when feeding from the standard bowl, dropping occurred in 38,5% of cats (p < 0,05). In the preference test, cats did not show a preference for either bowl (p > 0,05). Behavioral markers of sensory discomfort were not recorded. Conclusions. Bowl design affects feeding ergonomics and the amount of spilled feed but does not confirm the existence of whisker stress as a systemic phenomenon in domestic cats. Recommendations for the use of wide bowls may be justified by practical considerations of convenience.

Russian veterinary journalVol. 2026(4)
Federal Scientific Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academician L.K. Ernst (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.