Neurobehavioural outcomes after term IUGR from adolescence to adulthood: a cross-species scoping review

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with long-term neurobehavioural alterations. This scoping review mapped evidence on neurobehavioural outcomes following IUGR in term-born humans and preclinical animal models. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, six databases were searched from January 1985 to February 2025. Clinical studies were included if they assessed motor, cognitive, or anxiety outcomes in adolescents or young adults born at term with IUGR, small for gestational age (SGA), or low birth weight (LBW). Preclinical studies were included if IUGR was induced via placental insufficiency and behavioural outcomes evaluated at equivalent developmental stages. Data were charted and synthesised narratively. Twenty-eight studies (16 clinical, 12 preclinical) were included. Motor and cognitive outcomes were frequently assessed; anxiety-related behaviours were examined in fewer clinical studies despite frequent assessment in preclinical models. Motor coordination and memory outcomes were reported in both human and animal studies, though inconsistent diagnostic criteria and heterogeneous outcome measures limited cross-species comparisons. Most clinical studies classified participants as SGA or LBW; only two applied antenatal criteria to confirm IUGR. This evidence map reveals broad coverage of motor and cognitive domains but limited examination of anxiety outcomes in clinical populations. Standardising diagnostics and aligning behavioural assessments across species are priorities for translational comparability. This review was originally registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020197400) as a systematic review. The protocol has since been adapted to a scoping review framework; the PROSPERO registration reflects the original systematic review methodology, as PROSPERO does not accept scoping review registration. The adapted methodology is described in the Methods section below. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42020197400 . IMPACT: This is the first scoping review to map both clinical and preclinical evidence on neurobehavioural outcomes following IUGR beyond childhood into adolescence and young adulthood. Motor and cognitive outcomes are widely studied across species, but anxiety domains remain under-examined, particularly in human cohorts. Diagnostic inconsistency (SGA/LBW used as proxies for IUGR) and narrow species representation in preclinical studies are major barriers to translational alignment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Research
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-026-05583-3
Primary Topic
Birth, Development, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurobehavioural outcomes after term IUGR from adolescence to adulthood: a cross-species scoping review

Courtney P. Gilchrist, Meaghan Coyle, Ginevra Chincarini, Angela L. Cumberland et al.
Pediatric Research
Birth, Development, and Health
article

Neurobehavioural outcomes after term IUGR from adolescence to adulthood: a cross-species scoping review

Courtney P. Gilchrist, Meaghan Coyle, Ginevra Chincarini, Angela L. Cumberland, Mary Tolcos, David W. Walker
article en

Abstract

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with long-term neurobehavioural alterations. This scoping review mapped evidence on neurobehavioural outcomes following IUGR in term-born humans and preclinical animal models. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, six databases were searched from January 1985 to February 2025. Clinical studies were included if they assessed motor, cognitive, or anxiety outcomes in adolescents or young adults born at term with IUGR, small for gestational age (SGA), or low birth weight (LBW). Preclinical studies were included if IUGR was induced via placental insufficiency and behavioural outcomes evaluated at equivalent developmental stages. Data were charted and synthesised narratively. Twenty-eight studies (16 clinical, 12 preclinical) were included. Motor and cognitive outcomes were frequently assessed; anxiety-related behaviours were examined in fewer clinical studies despite frequent assessment in preclinical models. Motor coordination and memory outcomes were reported in both human and animal studies, though inconsistent diagnostic criteria and heterogeneous outcome measures limited cross-species comparisons. Most clinical studies classified participants as SGA or LBW; only two applied antenatal criteria to confirm IUGR. This evidence map reveals broad coverage of motor and cognitive domains but limited examination of anxiety outcomes in clinical populations. Standardising diagnostics and aligning behavioural assessments across species are priorities for translational comparability. This review was originally registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020197400) as a systematic review. The protocol has since been adapted to a scoping review framework; the PROSPERO registration reflects the original systematic review methodology, as PROSPERO does not accept scoping review registration. The adapted methodology is described in the Methods section below. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42020197400 . IMPACT: This is the first scoping review to map both clinical and preclinical evidence on neurobehavioural outcomes following IUGR beyond childhood into adolescence and young adulthood. Motor and cognitive outcomes are widely studied across species, but anxiety domains remain under-examined, particularly in human cohorts. Diagnostic inconsistency (SGA/LBW used as proxies for IUGR) and narrow species representation in preclinical studies are major barriers to translational alignment.

Pediatric Research
The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Calgary (CA), Hudson Institute of Medical Research (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Birth, Development, and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.