Adaptive stewardship of understanding: Artificial intelligence and intergenerational governance in mining

Mining stewardship has traditionally focused on the governance of physical assets, operational performance, environmental impacts, and organizational decision-making. While these responsibilities remain essential, they assume that the understanding supporting stewardship is comparatively stable. In reality, understanding continually evolves as new observations emerge, assumptions are revised, stakeholders change, institutions adapt, and stewardship extends across increasingly long temporal horizons. Artificial intelligence further transforms this process by participating in how observations are integrated, interpretations are developed, assumptions are reinforced or challenged, and institutional knowledge is preserved and communicated. Stewardship must therefore address not only what decisions are made, but also how understanding itself is created, maintained, questioned, and renewed. This paper proposes adaptive stewardship as a framework for governing an evolving ecology of understanding throughout the mine life cycle and beyond closure. The framework distinguishes understanding from observation, examines the lifecycle of assumptions, introduces the concepts of time windows of understanding and observation boundaries, and argues that governance must preserve the conditions under which understanding can continue to improve across generations. Within this ecology, artificial intelligence is treated not as an autonomous decision-maker but as an evolving participant whose value depends upon transparent governance that maintains visibility of assumptions, uncertainty, evidence, and human judgment. The paper concludes that the long-term objective of stewardship is not to preserve today's knowledge, but to preserve society's continuing capacity to develop better understanding as mining systems, environmental conditions, technologies, institutions, and societal expectations evolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Extractive Industries and Society
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2026.102077
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive stewardship of understanding: Artificial intelligence and intergenerational governance in mining

Priscilla P. Nelson
The Extractive Industries and Society
Mining and Resource Management
article

Adaptive stewardship of understanding: Artificial intelligence and intergenerational governance in mining

Priscilla P. Nelson
article en

Abstract

Mining stewardship has traditionally focused on the governance of physical assets, operational performance, environmental impacts, and organizational decision-making. While these responsibilities remain essential, they assume that the understanding supporting stewardship is comparatively stable. In reality, understanding continually evolves as new observations emerge, assumptions are revised, stakeholders change, institutions adapt, and stewardship extends across increasingly long temporal horizons. Artificial intelligence further transforms this process by participating in how observations are integrated, interpretations are developed, assumptions are reinforced or challenged, and institutional knowledge is preserved and communicated. Stewardship must therefore address not only what decisions are made, but also how understanding itself is created, maintained, questioned, and renewed. This paper proposes adaptive stewardship as a framework for governing an evolving ecology of understanding throughout the mine life cycle and beyond closure. The framework distinguishes understanding from observation, examines the lifecycle of assumptions, introduces the concepts of time windows of understanding and observation boundaries, and argues that governance must preserve the conditions under which understanding can continue to improve across generations. Within this ecology, artificial intelligence is treated not as an autonomous decision-maker but as an evolving participant whose value depends upon transparent governance that maintains visibility of assumptions, uncertainty, evidence, and human judgment. The paper concludes that the long-term objective of stewardship is not to preserve today's knowledge, but to preserve society's continuing capacity to develop better understanding as mining systems, environmental conditions, technologies, institutions, and societal expectations evolve.

The Extractive Industries and SocietyVol. 29
Colorado School of Mines (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.