Weaning Strategies for High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy of different high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) weaning protocols in critically ill adults. DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 1, 2022, to August 31, 2024, based on the suggested protocol (SLOWH trial). Experts reviewed the trial between October 2, 2024, and April 15, 2025. SETTING: Randomization was performed by a research coordinator using a sequence of random numbers generated by an independent statistician blinded to both researchers and participants. PATIENTS: Adults (≥ 18 yr old) in the ICU who met the weaning criteria after receiving HFNC were included. Among 102 patients from three tertiary care hospitals, 15 were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: The remaining patients were randomized into three intervention groups: flow reduction (FR) first, Fio2 reduction (OR) first, or simultaneous reduction (SR). The primary outcome was the HFNC weaning success rate, defined as successful transition to conventional oxygen therapy without the need for HFNC reapplication, noninvasive ventilation, or endotracheal intubation within 24 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 87 adults completed the trial (FR, n = 31 [male, 52%]; OR, n = 26 [male, 77%]; SR, n = 30 [male, 53%]). The weaning success rates in the FR, OR, and SR groups were 94%, 81%, and 77%, respectively (p = 0.15). The median [interquartile range] weaning duration was 31.0 hours (29.0-45.8 hr), 29.5 hours (28.0-60.4 hr), and 29.5 hours (26.5-45.0 hr) in the FR, OR, and SR groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference among groups (p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three HFNC weaning strategies in terms of weaning success or duration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007379
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weaning Strategies for High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Won Gun Kwack, Myung Jin Song, Seyoung Jung, Sunghoon Park et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Weaning Strategies for High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Won Gun Kwack, Myung Jin Song, Seyoung Jung, Sunghoon Park, Sung Yoon Lim, Eun Sun Kim, Taewoo Kim
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy of different high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) weaning protocols in critically ill adults. DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 1, 2022, to August 31, 2024, based on the suggested protocol (SLOWH trial). Experts reviewed the trial between October 2, 2024, and April 15, 2025. SETTING: Randomization was performed by a research coordinator using a sequence of random numbers generated by an independent statistician blinded to both researchers and participants. PATIENTS: Adults (≥ 18 yr old) in the ICU who met the weaning criteria after receiving HFNC were included. Among 102 patients from three tertiary care hospitals, 15 were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: The remaining patients were randomized into three intervention groups: flow reduction (FR) first, Fio2 reduction (OR) first, or simultaneous reduction (SR). The primary outcome was the HFNC weaning success rate, defined as successful transition to conventional oxygen therapy without the need for HFNC reapplication, noninvasive ventilation, or endotracheal intubation within 24 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 87 adults completed the trial (FR, n = 31 [male, 52%]; OR, n = 26 [male, 77%]; SR, n = 30 [male, 53%]). The weaning success rates in the FR, OR, and SR groups were 94%, 81%, and 77%, respectively (p = 0.15). The median [interquartile range] weaning duration was 31.0 hours (29.0-45.8 hr), 29.5 hours (28.0-60.4 hr), and 29.5 hours (26.5-45.0 hr) in the FR, OR, and SR groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference among groups (p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three HFNC weaning strategies in terms of weaning success or duration.

Critical Care Medicine
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Kyung Hee University (KR), Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KR), Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital (KR), Kyung Hee University Healthcare System (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.