Inseparability in Disaster Risk Science: Accounting for Coupled, Co‐Evolving Systems

Contemporary risk landscapes are shaped by systemic phenomena-compound disasters, cascading failures, non-stationarity, and cross-domain crises-that challenge conventional frameworks. While the classical risk equation (Risk = Hazard × Vulnerability × Exposure) remains a useful heuristic, it relies on a separability assumption that breaks down in feedback-rich, co-evolving systems. This failure reflects a familiar diagnosis: risk can be mistaken for a complicated problem, decomposable and optimizable, when it is a complex one, characterized by emergence and adaptation. Our contribution herein is not this distinction but its analytical consequence. Drawing on an interdisciplinary workshop on systemic risk and resilience, we propose inseparability as a foundational premise for disaster risk science. Hazard, exposure, and vulnerability might be better understood as dynamically coupled processes rather than separable variables. We derive implications across four axes: reframing vulnerability as a non-ergodic system property; addressing cross-scale dynamics; shifting from risk control to adaptive management; and treating knowledge co-production as a scientific necessity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Analysis
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70386
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inseparability in Disaster Risk Science: Accounting for Coupled, Co‐Evolving Systems

Sara Madureira Constantino, Elisabeth Krueger, Reinhard Mechler, Elco Koks et al.
Risk Analysis
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Inseparability in Disaster Risk Science: Accounting for Coupled, Co‐Evolving Systems

Sara Madureira Constantino, Elisabeth Krueger, Reinhard Mechler, Elco Koks, Dora Elia Ramos Muñoz, Pia‐Johanna Schweizer, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Stefan Kienberger, Haorui Wu, Ryan Michael McGranaghan, Alexandre Dunant, G. Falmagne, Silvia De Angeli, Stefan Hochrainer‐Stigler, Massimiliano Pittore, Marleen de Ruiter, Juan Camilo Gómez Zapata, Liz Jessica Olaya Calderon, Anqi Zhu, Thi Thu Ha Vo, Shahar Livne (24376108)
article en

Abstract

Contemporary risk landscapes are shaped by systemic phenomena-compound disasters, cascading failures, non-stationarity, and cross-domain crises-that challenge conventional frameworks. While the classical risk equation (Risk = Hazard × Vulnerability × Exposure) remains a useful heuristic, it relies on a separability assumption that breaks down in feedback-rich, co-evolving systems. This failure reflects a familiar diagnosis: risk can be mistaken for a complicated problem, decomposable and optimizable, when it is a complex one, characterized by emergence and adaptation. Our contribution herein is not this distinction but its analytical consequence. Drawing on an interdisciplinary workshop on systemic risk and resilience, we propose inseparability as a foundational premise for disaster risk science. Hazard, exposure, and vulnerability might be better understood as dynamically coupled processes rather than separable variables. We derive implications across four axes: reframing vulnerability as a non-ergodic system property; addressing cross-scale dynamics; shifting from risk control to adaptive management; and treating knowledge co-production as a scientific necessity.

Risk AnalysisVol. 46(11)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Dalhousie University (CA), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Eurac Research (IT), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Climate Analytics (DE), Technological University Dublin (IE), Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Environnements Continentaux (FR), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (MX), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Université de Lorraine (FR), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.