COVID-19 among people with intellectual disability in comparison to the general population: diagnoses, hospitalizations, deaths, and vaccinations (IDcare)

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities (ID) were identified as one of the vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, few studies have investigated a comprehensive set of COVID-19-related outcomes. The aim of this study is therefore to describe COVID-19-related diagnoses, hospitalizations, deaths, and vaccinations among people with ID compared to the general population. METHODS: This register-based cohort study included all people living in Skåne, Sweden, on January 1st, 2014. People with ID and still alive January 1st, 2020, constituted the ID cohort (n = 14 046). Those remaining after excluding people in the same family/household comprised the general population cohort (gPop, n = 1 157 138). Data regarding outcomes were collected from Swedish national and regional registers for 2020 and 2021. RESULTS: People in the ID cohort had higher risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 but were less likely than those in the gPop cohort to have the diagnosis confirmed by laboratory test. Adults and older people in the ID cohort had higher COVID-19 related healthcare utilization in terms of physical primary care visits in 2020 and hospitalizations in both 2020 and 2021, with some sex and age differences within the ID cohort. Among those with at least one physical primary care contact, adults and older women in the ID cohort had fewer contacts in 2020 compared to their peers in the gPop cohort. Where the number of observations allowed for analyses, people in the ID cohort had higher risk of death from COVID-19 than those in the gPop cohort. CONCLUSIONS: People with ID had similar healthcare utilization as the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the same or higher levels of COVID-related healthcare, and similar vaccination rates. However, people with ID with healthcare contacts had fewer contacts and bed days and higher mortality. Overall, the Swedish COVID-19 strategy regarding vaccination and healthcare prioritization for people with ID seems to have worked as intended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29868-8
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COVID-19 among people with intellectual disability in comparison to the general population: diagnoses, hospitalizations, deaths, and vaccinations (IDcare)

Jimmie Kristensson, Magnus Sandberg, Anna Axmon
BMC Public Health
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

COVID-19 among people with intellectual disability in comparison to the general population: diagnoses, hospitalizations, deaths, and vaccinations (IDcare)

Jimmie Kristensson, Magnus Sandberg, Anna Axmon
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities (ID) were identified as one of the vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, few studies have investigated a comprehensive set of COVID-19-related outcomes. The aim of this study is therefore to describe COVID-19-related diagnoses, hospitalizations, deaths, and vaccinations among people with ID compared to the general population. METHODS: This register-based cohort study included all people living in Skåne, Sweden, on January 1st, 2014. People with ID and still alive January 1st, 2020, constituted the ID cohort (n = 14 046). Those remaining after excluding people in the same family/household comprised the general population cohort (gPop, n = 1 157 138). Data regarding outcomes were collected from Swedish national and regional registers for 2020 and 2021. RESULTS: People in the ID cohort had higher risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 but were less likely than those in the gPop cohort to have the diagnosis confirmed by laboratory test. Adults and older people in the ID cohort had higher COVID-19 related healthcare utilization in terms of physical primary care visits in 2020 and hospitalizations in both 2020 and 2021, with some sex and age differences within the ID cohort. Among those with at least one physical primary care contact, adults and older women in the ID cohort had fewer contacts in 2020 compared to their peers in the gPop cohort. Where the number of observations allowed for analyses, people in the ID cohort had higher risk of death from COVID-19 than those in the gPop cohort. CONCLUSIONS: People with ID had similar healthcare utilization as the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the same or higher levels of COVID-related healthcare, and similar vaccination rates. However, people with ID with healthcare contacts had fewer contacts and bed days and higher mortality. Overall, the Swedish COVID-19 strategy regarding vaccination and healthcare prioritization for people with ID seems to have worked as intended.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Lund University (SE)
Lunds Universitet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.