Systematic bibliometric analysis of university students’ self-feedback literacy from 2010 to 2025

This study used bibliometric analysis to examine research on university students’ self-feedback literacy using records retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. The initial search identified 372 records published within a retrieval window from January 2010 to June 2025. Following screening, eligibility assessment, and bibliographic data cleaning, 14 records met the predefined eligibility criteria and were retained for the final bibliometric analysis. Given the small size of the final corpus and the partial coverage of 2025, the findings are interpreted as exploratory patterns within the retrieved dataset rather than as definitive representations of the broader research field. The study examined publication activity, sources, authorship, citations, keyword associations, thematic patterns, and country-level collaboration within the retrieved corpus, with the findings interpreted as exploratory evidence rather than generalizable estimates of the broader field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Education
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-02312-0
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic bibliometric analysis of university students’ self-feedback literacy from 2010 to 2025

程学高
Discover Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Systematic bibliometric analysis of university students’ self-feedback literacy from 2010 to 2025

程学高
article en

Abstract

This study used bibliometric analysis to examine research on university students’ self-feedback literacy using records retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. The initial search identified 372 records published within a retrieval window from January 2010 to June 2025. Following screening, eligibility assessment, and bibliographic data cleaning, 14 records met the predefined eligibility criteria and were retained for the final bibliometric analysis. Given the small size of the final corpus and the partial coverage of 2025, the findings are interpreted as exploratory patterns within the retrieved dataset rather than as definitive representations of the broader research field. The study examined publication activity, sources, authorship, citations, keyword associations, thematic patterns, and country-level collaboration within the retrieved corpus, with the findings interpreted as exploratory evidence rather than generalizable estimates of the broader field.

Discover EducationVol. 5(1)
Dhurakij Pundit University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.