Flexibility, relationships, and growth: an intrapersonal analysis of lessons learned in a participatory doctoral dissertation

Presently, much of the research on mental health is done by professionals and involves users of mental health services solely as research subjects. This limits the focus of mental health research to those topics that are defined by professionals instead of service users. In this article, I discuss the processes of a participatory doctoral dissertation in which we investigated structural barriers at university for students with mental health challenges. An overview of best participatory practices is provided, followed by a description of the current participatory project. Then, I reflect on three key learning points from the project as a doctoral researcher: 1) slippage in participatory practices due to project length and time constraints, 2) navigating the researcher role in complex interpersonal dynamics, and 3) lack of confidence, self-knowledge, and being human. In light of these key learning points, I close with a reflection on how key aspects of the literature can support the successful implementation of participatory practices: 1) acknowledging messy realities and the need for flexibility in conducting participatory research, 2) navigating care, power, and autonomy in complex interpersonal environments, and 3) reflexivity and transparency in the context of whole person participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Action Research
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2026.2750125
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexibility, relationships, and growth: an intrapersonal analysis of lessons learned in a participatory doctoral dissertation

Kari N. Duerksen
Educational Action Research
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Flexibility, relationships, and growth: an intrapersonal analysis of lessons learned in a participatory doctoral dissertation

Kari N. Duerksen
article en

Abstract

Presently, much of the research on mental health is done by professionals and involves users of mental health services solely as research subjects. This limits the focus of mental health research to those topics that are defined by professionals instead of service users. In this article, I discuss the processes of a participatory doctoral dissertation in which we investigated structural barriers at university for students with mental health challenges. An overview of best participatory practices is provided, followed by a description of the current participatory project. Then, I reflect on three key learning points from the project as a doctoral researcher: 1) slippage in participatory practices due to project length and time constraints, 2) navigating the researcher role in complex interpersonal dynamics, and 3) lack of confidence, self-knowledge, and being human. In light of these key learning points, I close with a reflection on how key aspects of the literature can support the successful implementation of participatory practices: 1) acknowledging messy realities and the need for flexibility in conducting participatory research, 2) navigating care, power, and autonomy in complex interpersonal environments, and 3) reflexivity and transparency in the context of whole person participation.

Educational Action Research
University of Manitoba (CA)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.