Dialect and multilingual identity: a Q methodological study with Hokkien-speaking university students in China

The multilingual turn in Applied Linguistics has given rise to much research on multilingual identity (MI), which concerns one’s relationship with their multilingual repertoire and self-positioning in the multilingual world. To date, most studies have focused on standard language varieties, leaving the role of dialects in MI construction largely unexamined. Framed by the ‘4Es’ model, this study explores the archetypal MI profiles of Hokkien-speaking university students in China based on Q-sort entries (n = 33) and post-sorting interviews (n = 12). Factor analysis revealed two MI positions that differed markedly in multilingual self-identification, namely the ‘Multilingual Aspirants with Hokkien Identity Struggles’ and the ‘Hokkien Advocates Hesitant in Multilingual Identification’. Interview data revealed multileveled challenges faced by the participants in claiming and sustaining their Hokkien speaker identities, which were constantly challenged by limited usage opportunities, low perceived instrumental value and struggles over ownership. Across both profiles, MI was more strongly associated with progress in prestigious linguistic varieties, particularly foreign languages, while dialect competence was seldom mobilised as a recognised multilingual capital. The findings show that MI is not determined by the size of one’s multilingual repertoire alone. Rather, evaluations, shaped by the broader sociocultural environment, are crucial in determining how different linguistic resources contribute to MI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2026.2747739
Primary Topic
Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialect and multilingual identity: a Q methodological study with Hokkien-speaking university students in China

Xinran Wu
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
article

Dialect and multilingual identity: a Q methodological study with Hokkien-speaking university students in China

Xinran Wu
article en

Abstract

The multilingual turn in Applied Linguistics has given rise to much research on multilingual identity (MI), which concerns one’s relationship with their multilingual repertoire and self-positioning in the multilingual world. To date, most studies have focused on standard language varieties, leaving the role of dialects in MI construction largely unexamined. Framed by the ‘4Es’ model, this study explores the archetypal MI profiles of Hokkien-speaking university students in China based on Q-sort entries (n = 33) and post-sorting interviews (n = 12). Factor analysis revealed two MI positions that differed markedly in multilingual self-identification, namely the ‘Multilingual Aspirants with Hokkien Identity Struggles’ and the ‘Hokkien Advocates Hesitant in Multilingual Identification’. Interview data revealed multileveled challenges faced by the participants in claiming and sustaining their Hokkien speaker identities, which were constantly challenged by limited usage opportunities, low perceived instrumental value and struggles over ownership. Across both profiles, MI was more strongly associated with progress in prestigious linguistic varieties, particularly foreign languages, while dialect competence was seldom mobilised as a recognised multilingual capital. The findings show that MI is not determined by the size of one’s multilingual repertoire alone. Rather, evaluations, shaped by the broader sociocultural environment, are crucial in determining how different linguistic resources contribute to MI.

Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
Xiamen University (CN)
Fujian Provincial Federation of Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.