Tail-risk-constrained portfolio optimization with cluster pre-selection and machine learning: risk-adjusted evidence from the S&P 500

Purpose Standard Gaussian risk frameworks underestimate extreme joint losses in large equity universes, exposing investors to unbudgeted drawdowns. This article develops and tests a portfolio-construction pipeline that disciplines tail risk while exploiting forward-looking return signals. Design/methodology/approach The four-stage pipeline integrates a rolling tail-index (Hill) filter, cluster pre-selection, a Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) risk-parity optimizer with Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) and extreme value theory (EVT) marginals and a Student-t copula, and an eight-classifier machine-learning ensemble that reallocates weights within the risk budget. It is tested on S&P 500 constituents across 75 monthly walk-forward windows (January 2020–January 2026), net of transaction costs. Findings Among twelve strategies, the pipeline delivers the highest Sharpe ratio (1.106) and monthly win rate (76.0%), surpassing risk parity, Hierarchical Risk Parity and the Gaussian CVaR specification it generalizes; block-bootstrap inference confirms its advantage over passive exposure (resampled mean Sharpe 1.316). Risk parity accumulates greater terminal wealth, a trade-off, since tail constraints curb high-momentum exposure in bull markets. Research limitations/implications The analysis is limited to S&P 500 constituents and a January 2020–January 2026 evaluation period. Results may differ in other asset classes, international markets or under alternative transaction-cost assumptions. Future research could examine adaptive clustering schemes, alternative dependence structures and real-time implementation constraints. Practical implications For investors prioritizing risk-adjusted efficiency over cumulative wealth, the framework is a transparent capital-allocation tool whose tail discipline holds at roughly 97 basis points annually. Originality/value To the authors' knowledge, this is the first to combine tail-index screening, clustering, GARCH-EVT-copula CVaR optimization and a machine-learning overlay within one framework, jointly addressing the dimensionality, distributional misspecification and information-neglect problems that defeat these tools in isolation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Capital Markets Studies
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jcms-06-2026-0114
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tail-risk-constrained portfolio optimization with cluster pre-selection and machine learning: risk-adjusted evidence from the S&P 500

David Toscano, Juan Carlos Roca
Journal of Capital Markets Studies
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
article

Tail-risk-constrained portfolio optimization with cluster pre-selection and machine learning: risk-adjusted evidence from the S&P 500

David Toscano, Juan Carlos Roca
article en

Abstract

Purpose Standard Gaussian risk frameworks underestimate extreme joint losses in large equity universes, exposing investors to unbudgeted drawdowns. This article develops and tests a portfolio-construction pipeline that disciplines tail risk while exploiting forward-looking return signals. Design/methodology/approach The four-stage pipeline integrates a rolling tail-index (Hill) filter, cluster pre-selection, a Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) risk-parity optimizer with Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) and extreme value theory (EVT) marginals and a Student-t copula, and an eight-classifier machine-learning ensemble that reallocates weights within the risk budget. It is tested on S&P 500 constituents across 75 monthly walk-forward windows (January 2020–January 2026), net of transaction costs. Findings Among twelve strategies, the pipeline delivers the highest Sharpe ratio (1.106) and monthly win rate (76.0%), surpassing risk parity, Hierarchical Risk Parity and the Gaussian CVaR specification it generalizes; block-bootstrap inference confirms its advantage over passive exposure (resampled mean Sharpe 1.316). Risk parity accumulates greater terminal wealth, a trade-off, since tail constraints curb high-momentum exposure in bull markets. Research limitations/implications The analysis is limited to S&P 500 constituents and a January 2020–January 2026 evaluation period. Results may differ in other asset classes, international markets or under alternative transaction-cost assumptions. Future research could examine adaptive clustering schemes, alternative dependence structures and real-time implementation constraints. Practical implications For investors prioritizing risk-adjusted efficiency over cumulative wealth, the framework is a transparent capital-allocation tool whose tail discipline holds at roughly 97 basis points annually. Originality/value To the authors' knowledge, this is the first to combine tail-index screening, clustering, GARCH-EVT-copula CVaR optimization and a machine-learning overlay within one framework, jointly addressing the dimensionality, distributional misspecification and information-neglect problems that defeat these tools in isolation.

Journal of Capital Markets Studies
Universidad de Huelva (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.