A robust and accurate two-sample Mendelian randomization method with a large number of genetic variants

Horizontal pleiotropy poses challenges in Mendelian randomization (MR) by biasing causal estimates, particularly when using numerous instrumental variables (IVs). We propose MRZ, a method that leverages IV-outcome association z-scores modeled as a mixture distribution to distinguish causal effects from IV-specific pleiotropy. MRZ classifies IVs into three categories: valid, uncorrelated pleiotropic, or correlated pleiotropic, enabling simultaneous estimation of causal and pleiotropic parameters through likelihood-based inference. Simulations demonstrate MRZ’s superior robustness and accuracy across diverse pleiotropic scenarios. When applied to investigate appendicular lean mass (ALM) and lipid traits, MRZ identifies significant negative causal effects of ALM on total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with no evidence of reverse causation. In contrast, existing methods frequently suggest bidirectional effects. Randomized controlled experiments in mice validate MRZ results, confirming ALM’s causal effects on TC/LDL-C but not vice versa. By addressing key limitations of conventional approaches vulnerable to horizontal pleiotropy, MRZ advances causal inference in complex trait architectures. The authors develop MRZ, a Mendelian randomization method that models variant-outcome z-scores as a mixture to separate causal effects from pleiotropy, and validate the causal findings in mouse experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78442-8
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A robust and accurate two-sample Mendelian randomization method with a large number of genetic variants

Chen Bi-kun, Haigang Ren, Yu‐Fang Pei, Xiu-Juan Yu et al.
Nature Communications
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

A robust and accurate two-sample Mendelian randomization method with a large number of genetic variants

Chen Bi-kun, Haigang Ren, Yu‐Fang Pei, Xiu-Juan Yu, Qi‐Gang Zhao, Lei Zhang, Xian-Mei He, Fan Bu, Jun-Jie Niu, Li Luo, Yuan Luo, Xiao Zheng
article en

Abstract

Horizontal pleiotropy poses challenges in Mendelian randomization (MR) by biasing causal estimates, particularly when using numerous instrumental variables (IVs). We propose MRZ, a method that leverages IV-outcome association z-scores modeled as a mixture distribution to distinguish causal effects from IV-specific pleiotropy. MRZ classifies IVs into three categories: valid, uncorrelated pleiotropic, or correlated pleiotropic, enabling simultaneous estimation of causal and pleiotropic parameters through likelihood-based inference. Simulations demonstrate MRZ’s superior robustness and accuracy across diverse pleiotropic scenarios. When applied to investigate appendicular lean mass (ALM) and lipid traits, MRZ identifies significant negative causal effects of ALM on total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with no evidence of reverse causation. In contrast, existing methods frequently suggest bidirectional effects. Randomized controlled experiments in mice validate MRZ results, confirming ALM’s causal effects on TC/LDL-C but not vice versa. By addressing key limitations of conventional approaches vulnerable to horizontal pleiotropy, MRZ advances causal inference in complex trait architectures. The authors develop MRZ, a Mendelian randomization method that models variant-outcome z-scores as a mixture to separate causal effects from pleiotropy, and validate the causal findings in mouse experiments.

Nature Communications
Soochow University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education, India, Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.