The revenue exception: Why high performers escape accountability and what boards can do

Every organization has conduct standards, yet a quiet exception often emerges: when a senior leader generates substantial revenue, those standards bend. We call this the revenue exception and explain why it persists and how boards can address it. Drawing on cases from hospital medicine, professional services, finance, and NCAA athletics, we identify four structural conditions that sustain it: concentrated revenue, high replacement cost, contractual insulation, and hiring markets that discount conduct history. Our framework proposes that revenue concentration is the necessary antecedent and specifies what evidence would disconfirm the claim. We then identify four interventions: name the exception through a recorded board question and backward audit; redesign high-revenue contracts; apply standards visibly while protecting reporters; and engage accreditors in developing portable conduct disclosure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Dynamics
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2026.101290
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The revenue exception: Why high performers escape accountability and what boards can do

Shane Spiller, Robert D. Hatfield
Organizational Dynamics
Ethics in Business and Education
article

The revenue exception: Why high performers escape accountability and what boards can do

Shane Spiller, Robert D. Hatfield
article en

Abstract

Every organization has conduct standards, yet a quiet exception often emerges: when a senior leader generates substantial revenue, those standards bend. We call this the revenue exception and explain why it persists and how boards can address it. Drawing on cases from hospital medicine, professional services, finance, and NCAA athletics, we identify four structural conditions that sustain it: concentrated revenue, high replacement cost, contractual insulation, and hiring markets that discount conduct history. Our framework proposes that revenue concentration is the necessary antecedent and specifies what evidence would disconfirm the claim. We then identify four interventions: name the exception through a recorded board question and backward audit; redesign high-revenue contracts; apply standards visibly while protecting reporters; and engage accreditors in developing portable conduct disclosure.

Organizational DynamicsVol. 55(4)
Western Kentucky University (US)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.