X-ray powder diffraction as a pre-screening tool for 3D electron diffraction of nanocrystalline organic compounds

Abstract Three-dimensional electron diffraction (3D ED) allows the determination of crystal structures of nanocrystalline organic compounds. However, even 3D ED requires a minimum level of crystallinity. For the pre-selection of samples for 3D ED, a practical tool was developed that uses routine laboratory X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) data. The procedure was evaluated on 29 samples covering 17 industrial organic pigments (aromatic or heterocyclic compounds with 21–57 non-hydrogen atoms). The samples exhibited a broad range of crystallinity, from well-crystalline to nearly amorphous; most were nanocrystalline and at the borderline of suitability for 3D ED. All samples were investigated by 3D ED with extensive attempts at structure solution and refinement. Additionally, XRPD data were recorded. From the XRPD data several quality indicators were derived: the number of visible peaks, the presence of peaks at 2 θ above 30°, peak widths, domain sizes, the peak-height-to-background ratio, and the indexability of the powder data. The most reliable indicator for 3D ED success is the domain size calculated from widths of three XRPD peaks using the Scherrer formula. For all samples with domain sizes of more than 31 nm the crystal structure could be solved by 3D ED, whereas structure solution failed for all samples with less than 31 nm. Hence, the XRPD-derived domain size serves as an easy-to-use pre-selection tool for 3D ED. Other indicators were less decisive. The value of approximately 30 nm should be regarded as a practical lower limit for successful structure determination of similar organic compounds by current 3D ED methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2026-0018
Primary Topic
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

X-ray powder diffraction as a pre-screening tool for 3D electron diffraction of nanocrystalline organic compounds

Tatiana E. Gorelik, Martin U. Piepenbring, Antonia Winderling
Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
article

X-ray powder diffraction as a pre-screening tool for 3D electron diffraction of nanocrystalline organic compounds

Tatiana E. Gorelik, Martin U. Piepenbring, Antonia Winderling
article en

Abstract

Abstract Three-dimensional electron diffraction (3D ED) allows the determination of crystal structures of nanocrystalline organic compounds. However, even 3D ED requires a minimum level of crystallinity. For the pre-selection of samples for 3D ED, a practical tool was developed that uses routine laboratory X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) data. The procedure was evaluated on 29 samples covering 17 industrial organic pigments (aromatic or heterocyclic compounds with 21–57 non-hydrogen atoms). The samples exhibited a broad range of crystallinity, from well-crystalline to nearly amorphous; most were nanocrystalline and at the borderline of suitability for 3D ED. All samples were investigated by 3D ED with extensive attempts at structure solution and refinement. Additionally, XRPD data were recorded. From the XRPD data several quality indicators were derived: the number of visible peaks, the presence of peaks at 2 θ above 30°, peak widths, domain sizes, the peak-height-to-background ratio, and the indexability of the powder data. The most reliable indicator for 3D ED success is the domain size calculated from widths of three XRPD peaks using the Scherrer formula. For all samples with domain sizes of more than 31 nm the crystal structure could be solved by 3D ED, whereas structure solution failed for all samples with less than 31 nm. Hence, the XRPD-derived domain size serves as an easy-to-use pre-selection tool for 3D ED. Other indicators were less decisive. The value of approximately 30 nm should be regarded as a practical lower limit for successful structure determination of similar organic compounds by current 3D ED methods.

Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Ernst Ruska Centre (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.