Accuracy, Usefulness, and Expert-Perceived Clinical Impact of Response Variability in ChatGPT-4o for Hyperlipidemia-Related Questions

ChatGPT-4o, an advanced Artificial Intelligence based large language model, has demonstrated utility for providing medical information. Data regarding its accuracy and usefulness for hyperlipidemia pharmacotherapy are limited. Additionally, the clinical implications of variability in responses generated from simultaneous identical prompts across multiple sessions remains poorly understood. This research aimed to (1) assess accuracy, (2) evaluate usefulness, and (3) examine perceived impact variability of ChatGPT-4o generated responses to hyperlipidemia-related clinical questions. Five questions addressing hyperlipidemia management and patient counseling were developed. Responses to the questions were collected simultaneously from three independent ChatGPT-4o sessions initiated in separate, newly opened ChatGPT windows. A modified Delphi technique using clinical pharmacy faculty evaluated responses for accuracy, usefulness, and impact variability. Scores were evaluated using a 3-point Likert scale. After initial scoring, responses were collected, collated, and redistributed to faculty for review and optional revision. Final evaluations and consensus were facilitated by a moderator during a virtual panel. Consensus was reached for all responses. Evaluations of response accuracy ranged from poor to good, while usefulness ranged between somewhat useful and very useful. Impact variability ranged from none to high across responses, which faculty concluded could impact patient management. Response variability may have potential clinical implications; however, the present study evaluated expert-perceived potential impact rather than actual patient outcomes. Users should be aware concurrently generated ChatGPT responses can differ in accuracy and usefulness. Clinical judgment and patient-centered multidisciplinary collaboration remain essential. Future directions include using a larger data set to corroborate findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900261498069
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy, Usefulness, and Expert-Perceived Clinical Impact of Response Variability in ChatGPT-4o for Hyperlipidemia-Related Questions

Sharmon P. Osae, Russ H. Palmer, Robin L. Southwood, Joshua Caballero et al.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Accuracy, Usefulness, and Expert-Perceived Clinical Impact of Response Variability in ChatGPT-4o for Hyperlipidemia-Related Questions

Sharmon P. Osae, Russ H. Palmer, Robin L. Southwood, Joshua Caballero, Devin L. Lavender, Lorenzo Villa Zapata, Rebecca H. Stone, Richard Lamb, Sarah Grace White
article en

Abstract

ChatGPT-4o, an advanced Artificial Intelligence based large language model, has demonstrated utility for providing medical information. Data regarding its accuracy and usefulness for hyperlipidemia pharmacotherapy are limited. Additionally, the clinical implications of variability in responses generated from simultaneous identical prompts across multiple sessions remains poorly understood. This research aimed to (1) assess accuracy, (2) evaluate usefulness, and (3) examine perceived impact variability of ChatGPT-4o generated responses to hyperlipidemia-related clinical questions. Five questions addressing hyperlipidemia management and patient counseling were developed. Responses to the questions were collected simultaneously from three independent ChatGPT-4o sessions initiated in separate, newly opened ChatGPT windows. A modified Delphi technique using clinical pharmacy faculty evaluated responses for accuracy, usefulness, and impact variability. Scores were evaluated using a 3-point Likert scale. After initial scoring, responses were collected, collated, and redistributed to faculty for review and optional revision. Final evaluations and consensus were facilitated by a moderator during a virtual panel. Consensus was reached for all responses. Evaluations of response accuracy ranged from poor to good, while usefulness ranged between somewhat useful and very useful. Impact variability ranged from none to high across responses, which faculty concluded could impact patient management. Response variability may have potential clinical implications; however, the present study evaluated expert-perceived potential impact rather than actual patient outcomes. Users should be aware concurrently generated ChatGPT responses can differ in accuracy and usefulness. Clinical judgment and patient-centered multidisciplinary collaboration remain essential. Future directions include using a larger data set to corroborate findings.

Journal of Pharmacy Practice
University of Georgia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.