Mapping evidence on kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: This review identified, synthesized, and mapped the scientific evidence on kinesiophobia, as assessed by the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), to provide clinicians with a comprehensive evidence map. INTRODUCTION: Kinesiophobia can negatively impact rehabilitation and return-to-sport outcomes after ACLR. Despite its clinical relevance, the available evidence is fragmented, making it challenging for clinicians to find clear answers to their clinical questions and apply findings consistently in practice. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We considered studies that assessed kinesiophobia using the TSK in individuals of any age or sex following ACLR, regardless of sport participation or geographical setting. Included sources comprised peer-reviewed primary and secondary research. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCOhost), SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost), CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), and MEDLINE (EBSCOhost) databases up to September 2025. Research alerts were then maintained throughout the review process to identify newly published studies. A framework synthesis approach was adopted, whereby studies were systematically charted across 10 thematic domains, reflecting how kinesiophobia has been investigated in ACLR. RESULTS: A total of 145 studies were included in this review. Most were cross-sectional and conducted in high-income countries, while longitudinal studies were limited. Adolescents and females were underrepresented, and the sample sizes and participant characteristics varied widely. Kinesiophobia was examined in relation to personal, clinical, functional, and neurophysiological variables. Intervention studies were scarce but explored cognitive-behavioral, educational, physical, and multimodal strategies for managing kinesiophobia. Only 2 studies adapted the TSK specifically for ACLR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians now have access to a structured map of the evidence on kinesiophobia post-ACLR, which may inform clinical reflection. Future research should address methodological limitations and expand investigations in underrepresented populations and contexts. REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/dh4jk/JK.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-26-00001
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping evidence on kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review.

Vanessa Luísa Botas Alpalhão, Nuno Cordeiro, Pedro Pezarat Correia, João R Vaz
PubMed
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Mapping evidence on kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review.

Vanessa Luísa Botas Alpalhão, Nuno Cordeiro, Pedro Pezarat Correia, João R Vaz
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This review identified, synthesized, and mapped the scientific evidence on kinesiophobia, as assessed by the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), to provide clinicians with a comprehensive evidence map. INTRODUCTION: Kinesiophobia can negatively impact rehabilitation and return-to-sport outcomes after ACLR. Despite its clinical relevance, the available evidence is fragmented, making it challenging for clinicians to find clear answers to their clinical questions and apply findings consistently in practice. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We considered studies that assessed kinesiophobia using the TSK in individuals of any age or sex following ACLR, regardless of sport participation or geographical setting. Included sources comprised peer-reviewed primary and secondary research. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCOhost), SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost), CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), and MEDLINE (EBSCOhost) databases up to September 2025. Research alerts were then maintained throughout the review process to identify newly published studies. A framework synthesis approach was adopted, whereby studies were systematically charted across 10 thematic domains, reflecting how kinesiophobia has been investigated in ACLR. RESULTS: A total of 145 studies were included in this review. Most were cross-sectional and conducted in high-income countries, while longitudinal studies were limited. Adolescents and females were underrepresented, and the sample sizes and participant characteristics varied widely. Kinesiophobia was examined in relation to personal, clinical, functional, and neurophysiological variables. Intervention studies were scarce but explored cognitive-behavioral, educational, physical, and multimodal strategies for managing kinesiophobia. Only 2 studies adapted the TSK specifically for ACLR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians now have access to a structured map of the evidence on kinesiophobia post-ACLR, which may inform clinical reflection. Future research should address methodological limitations and expand investigations in underrepresented populations and contexts. REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/dh4jk/JK.

PubMed
Universidade Politécnica de Castelo Branco (PT), Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.