Best subset selection meets resampling: tackling selection instability at very low numbers of events per variable

Trust is a basic necessity for translating machine learning models from bench to bedside. To foster clinicians' trust in predictive models, these models should be interpretable or explainable. A major prerequisite for interpretability or explainability is that feature subsets are stable, i.e., that predictors returned by feature or best subset selection approaches do not change dramatically when the data is perturbed only slightly. However, prior research has shown that stable selections are usually not possible when the number of labels in the smaller class per feature, or outcome events per variable (EPV), is very low, and it remains challenging to build stable, interpretable models in such cases. In this work, we conduct a narrative review in the very low EPV regime and propose to combine cardinality-constrained best subset selection for logistic regression with resampling to tackle the selection instability. We perform a comprehensive evaluation on both synthetic and real-world clinical data, and find that our novel resampling-based model selection procedure yields interpretable feature subsets with a better discriminative performance and stability compared to best subset selection without resampling as well as feature selection with and without resampling. A Python package implementing the proposed methods is available at https://github.com/ml-lab-htw/l0l2learn.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Biostatistics
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2025-0024
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best subset selection meets resampling: tackling selection instability at very low numbers of events per variable

Georg N. Duda, Erik Rodner, Deborah Falla, Nicholas M. Brisson et al.
The International Journal of Biostatistics
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Best subset selection meets resampling: tackling selection instability at very low numbers of events per variable

Georg N. Duda, Erik Rodner, Deborah Falla, Nicholas M. Brisson, Ricardo Knauer, David W. Evans
article en

Abstract

Trust is a basic necessity for translating machine learning models from bench to bedside. To foster clinicians' trust in predictive models, these models should be interpretable or explainable. A major prerequisite for interpretability or explainability is that feature subsets are stable, i.e., that predictors returned by feature or best subset selection approaches do not change dramatically when the data is perturbed only slightly. However, prior research has shown that stable selections are usually not possible when the number of labels in the smaller class per feature, or outcome events per variable (EPV), is very low, and it remains challenging to build stable, interpretable models in such cases. In this work, we conduct a narrative review in the very low EPV regime and propose to combine cardinality-constrained best subset selection for logistic regression with resampling to tackle the selection instability. We perform a comprehensive evaluation on both synthetic and real-world clinical data, and find that our novel resampling-based model selection procedure yields interpretable feature subsets with a better discriminative performance and stability compared to best subset selection without resampling as well as feature selection with and without resampling. A Python package implementing the proposed methods is available at https://github.com/ml-lab-htw/l0l2learn.

The International Journal of Biostatistics
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.