Liposomal bupivacaine does not prolong neuraxial blockade and produces less consistent motor blockade than bupivacaine hydrochloride in inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps)

Objective: To compare the effects of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to standard bupivacaine hydrochloride (B) formulation following neuraxial injection in inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps). Methods: 12 adult bearded dragons (0.35 ± 0.13 kg) were sedated with alfaxalone (15 mg/kg SC), and neuraxial injections were performed with B treatment (1.5 mg/kg to 0.3 mL/kg) and LB treatment (4 mg/kg to 0.3 mL/kg) in all animals in a randomized, crossover, blinded experimental design with a 7-day interval. Motor/sensory block was assessed by mechanical stimulation of limbs; 25%, 50%, and 75% of the trunk's length; and cloacal vent tone. Heart rate, respiratory rate, righting reflex, and head position were evaluated. Results: Overall success was 100% for B treatment and 92% for LB treatment. Median onset was 5 minutes for both B and LB treatments. Duration and extent of blockade were similar between treatments; however, pelvic limb motor blockade was less consistent in the LB treatment (7 of 12 animals), with 3 animals showing unilateral blockade. Apnea requiring manual ventilation occurred in 2 animals in the B treatment and in 2 animals in the LB treatment. Conclusions: Bupivacaine hydrochloride at 1.5 mg/kg (0.3 mL/kg) produced reliable motor and sensory blockade but resulted in respiratory complications. Liposomal bupivacaine at 4 mg/kg (0.3 mL/kg) resulted in a similar onset, extent and duration of blockade but less consistent motor blockade and was also associated with respiratory complications. Clinical Relevance: Neuraxial injection continues to show promise as a regional anesthetic technique in healthy bearded dragons, providing extensive motor and sensory blockade. However, respiratory complications occurred with both bupivacaine formulations at the doses evaluated, indicating that lower doses should be used. Further studies are needed to establish the safety profile and clinical advantages of lipossomal bupivacaine before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.26.08.0347
Primary Topic
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liposomal bupivacaine does not prolong neuraxial blockade and produces less consistent motor blockade than bupivacaine hydrochloride in inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps)

Johnny A. Uelmen, Christoph Mans, Dustin M. Fink, Tatiana Henriques Ferreira
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
article

Liposomal bupivacaine does not prolong neuraxial blockade and produces less consistent motor blockade than bupivacaine hydrochloride in inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps)

Johnny A. Uelmen, Christoph Mans, Dustin M. Fink, Tatiana Henriques Ferreira
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to standard bupivacaine hydrochloride (B) formulation following neuraxial injection in inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps). Methods: 12 adult bearded dragons (0.35 ± 0.13 kg) were sedated with alfaxalone (15 mg/kg SC), and neuraxial injections were performed with B treatment (1.5 mg/kg to 0.3 mL/kg) and LB treatment (4 mg/kg to 0.3 mL/kg) in all animals in a randomized, crossover, blinded experimental design with a 7-day interval. Motor/sensory block was assessed by mechanical stimulation of limbs; 25%, 50%, and 75% of the trunk's length; and cloacal vent tone. Heart rate, respiratory rate, righting reflex, and head position were evaluated. Results: Overall success was 100% for B treatment and 92% for LB treatment. Median onset was 5 minutes for both B and LB treatments. Duration and extent of blockade were similar between treatments; however, pelvic limb motor blockade was less consistent in the LB treatment (7 of 12 animals), with 3 animals showing unilateral blockade. Apnea requiring manual ventilation occurred in 2 animals in the B treatment and in 2 animals in the LB treatment. Conclusions: Bupivacaine hydrochloride at 1.5 mg/kg (0.3 mL/kg) produced reliable motor and sensory blockade but resulted in respiratory complications. Liposomal bupivacaine at 4 mg/kg (0.3 mL/kg) resulted in a similar onset, extent and duration of blockade but less consistent motor blockade and was also associated with respiratory complications. Clinical Relevance: Neuraxial injection continues to show promise as a regional anesthetic technique in healthy bearded dragons, providing extensive motor and sensory blockade. However, respiratory complications occurred with both bupivacaine formulations at the doses evaluated, indicating that lower doses should be used. Further studies are needed to establish the safety profile and clinical advantages of lipossomal bupivacaine before clinical use.

American Journal of Veterinary Research
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.