Associations of food processing and dietary risk factors with colorectal cancer incidence in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study: A cohort study

BACKGROUND: Ultra-processed foods (UPF) account for >50% of energy intake by US adults. UPF intake can include dietary components linked to lower colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, such as whole grain and dairy products, and others linked to higher CRC risk, such as processed meats, potentially explaining the heterogeneity of evidence for an association between UPF and CRC risk. Our goal was to estimate the associations of UPF and established CRC-related dietary factors, by UPF and non-UPF source, with CRC incidence in a large cohort study. METHODS AND FINDINGS: US adults, aged 50-71, who enrolled in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study in 1995-96, self-reported dietary intake using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Median UPF intake was 293 g/1000 kcal/day or 43% of daily energy intake. We assigned disaggregated FFQ items to Nova classification and categorized UPF intake (g/1000 kcal/day) into sex-specific quintiles. Participants who were cancer-free at baseline (N = 461,682) were followed for cancer incidence through 2018, and 10,075 colorectal adenocarcinoma cases were diagnosed. We used multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and health-related factors, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol drinking, to estimate associations for UPF and related dietary components with CRC incidence. UPF intake was not associated with CRC incidence (hazard ratio 5th versus 1st quintile 0.97; 95% confidence interval [0.91-1.03]; ptrend = 0.55). Whole grain, fiber, dairy, and calcium intakes from UPF sources were inversely but meat intake from UPF sources was positively associated with CRC incidence. The main limitations of the study relate to its observational design and include potential residual confounding and exposure misclassification owing to systematic or random error in self-reported dietary data. CONCLUSIONS: Total UPF intake was not associated with incident CRC in this cohort of older, US adults. This may be explained, in part, by opposing associations of some UPF with CRC risk. Our findings support current dietary guidance to consume whole grains, fiber, dairy, and calcium and avoid processed meat for CRC prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Medicine
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1005251
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations of food processing and dietary risk factors with colorectal cancer incidence in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study: A cohort study

Hyokyoung Grace Hong, Lisa Kahle, Longgang Zhao, Caitlin P. O’Connell et al.
1 citations
PLoS Medicine
Nutritional Studies and Diet
6.08
article

Associations of food processing and dietary risk factors with colorectal cancer incidence in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study: A cohort study

Hyokyoung Grace Hong, Lisa Kahle, Longgang Zhao, Caitlin P. O’Connell, Linda M. Liao, Neha Khandpur, Leila Abar, Erikka Loftfield, Kirsten Herrick, Sémi Zouiouich, Eurídice Martínez Steele, Jennifer Lerman, Xinyuan Zhang, Xuehong Zhang, Rashmi Sinha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultra-processed foods (UPF) account for >50% of energy intake by US adults. UPF intake can include dietary components linked to lower colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, such as whole grain and dairy products, and others linked to higher CRC risk, such as processed meats, potentially explaining the heterogeneity of evidence for an association between UPF and CRC risk. Our goal was to estimate the associations of UPF and established CRC-related dietary factors, by UPF and non-UPF source, with CRC incidence in a large cohort study. METHODS AND FINDINGS: US adults, aged 50-71, who enrolled in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study in 1995-96, self-reported dietary intake using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Median UPF intake was 293 g/1000 kcal/day or 43% of daily energy intake. We assigned disaggregated FFQ items to Nova classification and categorized UPF intake (g/1000 kcal/day) into sex-specific quintiles. Participants who were cancer-free at baseline (N = 461,682) were followed for cancer incidence through 2018, and 10,075 colorectal adenocarcinoma cases were diagnosed. We used multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and health-related factors, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol drinking, to estimate associations for UPF and related dietary components with CRC incidence. UPF intake was not associated with CRC incidence (hazard ratio 5th versus 1st quintile 0.97; 95% confidence interval [0.91-1.03]; ptrend = 0.55). Whole grain, fiber, dairy, and calcium intakes from UPF sources were inversely but meat intake from UPF sources was positively associated with CRC incidence. The main limitations of the study relate to its observational design and include potential residual confounding and exposure misclassification owing to systematic or random error in self-reported dietary data. CONCLUSIONS: Total UPF intake was not associated with incident CRC in this cohort of older, US adults. This may be explained, in part, by opposing associations of some UPF with CRC risk. Our findings support current dietary guidance to consume whole grains, fiber, dairy, and calcium and avoid processed meat for CRC prevention.

PLoS MedicineVol. 23(10)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Yale University (US), World Health Organization (CH), Information Management Services (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Pennsylvania Department of Health, California Department of Public Health, Florida Department of Health, Emory University, Arizona Department of Health Services, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Louisiana State University, Texas Department of State Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
6.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.