Thermo-exergetic optimization and local temperature field behavior in multi-tray solar drying systems with double-pass absorbers

Solar drying technology represents a sustainable solution for post-harvest food preservation in tropical regions; however, uneven internal airflow and poor thermal distribution across multi-tray chambers often cause inconsistent product quality and substantial thermodynamic losses. To address these limitations, this study presents a comprehensive thermodynamic, exergy, and tray-level thermal environment evaluation of a multi-tray solar dryer numerically investigated under the climatic conditions of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Three distinct collector and glazing architectures were analyzed: a double-absorber double-glass design (Design 1), a single-absorber double-glass design (Design 2), and a single-absorber single-glass design (Design 3). Using parametric inlet air velocity simulations ( 0.1 − 1.0 m/s), system performance was evaluated in terms of thermal energy efficiency ( η th ), exergy efficiency ( η ex ), exergy destruction rate ( E dest ), Sustainability Index ( S I ), and spatial temperature profiles across bottom ( y = 0.50 m), middle ( y = 0.80 m), and top ( y = 1.10 m) trays. Results demonstrate that Design 1 substantially outperforms the other configurations, reaching a maximum thermal efficiency of 79.6% and an exergy efficiency of 3.12% at 1.0 m/s, compared to 70.2% ( η th ) and 2.35% ( η ex ) for Design 2, and 62.1% ( η th ) and 1.81% ( η ex ) for Design 3. Although all designs exhibit comparable mean exergy destruction rates ( ∼ 840 − 850 W ), Design 1 achieves the highest Sustainability Index ( S I = 1.032 ). Tray-level thermal environment analyses reveal that Design 1 effectively mitigates cold spots across all tray levels, achieving high thermal uniformity with transverse temperature spans of 300.4-303.8 K (bottom, y = 0.50 m), 301.0-303.8 K (middle, y = 0.80 m), and 301.6-303.8 K (top, y = 1.10 m), corresponding to a maximum transverse variation of only 3.4 K. In contrast, Design 2 and Design 3 exhibit pronounced central cold spots with maximum transverse thermal gradients of up to 6.3 K and 8.8 K, respectively, reaching a severe temperature drop down to 293.1 K at the bottom tray of Design 3. These quantitative insights establish the double-pass absorber approach as an effective strategy for optimizing both global thermodynamic efficiency and localized tray-level drying uniformity in equatorial climates like Yaoundé.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Stored Products Research
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2026.103273
Primary Topic
Food Drying and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermo-exergetic optimization and local temperature field behavior in multi-tray solar drying systems with double-pass absorbers

Pascalin Tiam Kapen, Pamela Donchi Aghogue, René Tchinda
Journal of Stored Products Research
Food Drying and Modeling
article

Thermo-exergetic optimization and local temperature field behavior in multi-tray solar drying systems with double-pass absorbers

Pascalin Tiam Kapen, Pamela Donchi Aghogue, René Tchinda
article en

Abstract

Solar drying technology represents a sustainable solution for post-harvest food preservation in tropical regions; however, uneven internal airflow and poor thermal distribution across multi-tray chambers often cause inconsistent product quality and substantial thermodynamic losses. To address these limitations, this study presents a comprehensive thermodynamic, exergy, and tray-level thermal environment evaluation of a multi-tray solar dryer numerically investigated under the climatic conditions of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Three distinct collector and glazing architectures were analyzed: a double-absorber double-glass design (Design 1), a single-absorber double-glass design (Design 2), and a single-absorber single-glass design (Design 3). Using parametric inlet air velocity simulations ( 0.1 − 1.0 m/s), system performance was evaluated in terms of thermal energy efficiency ( η th ), exergy efficiency ( η ex ), exergy destruction rate ( E dest ), Sustainability Index ( S I ), and spatial temperature profiles across bottom ( y = 0.50 m), middle ( y = 0.80 m), and top ( y = 1.10 m) trays. Results demonstrate that Design 1 substantially outperforms the other configurations, reaching a maximum thermal efficiency of 79.6% and an exergy efficiency of 3.12% at 1.0 m/s, compared to 70.2% ( η th ) and 2.35% ( η ex ) for Design 2, and 62.1% ( η th ) and 1.81% ( η ex ) for Design 3. Although all designs exhibit comparable mean exergy destruction rates ( ∼ 840 − 850 W ), Design 1 achieves the highest Sustainability Index ( S I = 1.032 ). Tray-level thermal environment analyses reveal that Design 1 effectively mitigates cold spots across all tray levels, achieving high thermal uniformity with transverse temperature spans of 300.4-303.8 K (bottom, y = 0.50 m), 301.0-303.8 K (middle, y = 0.80 m), and 301.6-303.8 K (top, y = 1.10 m), corresponding to a maximum transverse variation of only 3.4 K. In contrast, Design 2 and Design 3 exhibit pronounced central cold spots with maximum transverse thermal gradients of up to 6.3 K and 8.8 K, respectively, reaching a severe temperature drop down to 293.1 K at the bottom tray of Design 3. These quantitative insights establish the double-pass absorber approach as an effective strategy for optimizing both global thermodynamic efficiency and localized tray-level drying uniformity in equatorial climates like Yaoundé.

Journal of Stored Products ResearchVol. 120
Université de Dschang (CM)
Affordable and clean energy, Climate action, Responsible consumption and production, Zero hunger, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Food Drying and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.