Public Perceptions of Personal Data Spaces for Citizen-Centered Health Data Governance in Belgium: Cross-Sectional Survey

Background/Objectives: Personal Data Spaces (PDSs) are promoted as infrastructures that strengthen citizen participation in health data governance through transparency and individual control. However, empirical evidence on citizens’ views of PDSs remains limited. This study examined how citizens evaluate We Are, a proposed citizen-centered PDS model in Flanders, Belgium, including overall support, preferences for control and transparency, acceptance of different data types and uses, and factors associated with support. Methods: An online survey was conducted among 1041 adults aged 18–79 years in Flanders using quotas for gender, age, education, province, and urbanization. Participants evaluated the We Are model and completed measures concerning reasons for support, control and transparency, storage of medical and lifestyle data, and data sharing across purposes and recipient types. Data were analyzed using t-tests, linear regression, and mixed models with repeated measures. Results: We Are evaluations were ambivalent but slightly positive (M = 2.51 on a 1–4 scale) and did not differ significantly from the scale midpoint. Sociodemographic characteristics explained little variance in support (R2 = 0.033), whereas adding understanding and psychographic factors increased variance to R2 = 0.238. Respondents valued control more than transparency and were more willing to store medical than lifestyle data (Δ = 0.380, p < 0.001). Willingness to share data was higher for both personal and public non-commercial uses than for public commercial uses, whereas personal commercial uses were rated lower. Private recipients were associated with lower willingness to share than public recipients. Conclusions: Support for PDSs was conditional and related more strongly to understanding and psychographic factors than to sociodemographic characteristics. These findings indicate that PDSs should be embedded in governance arrangements that provide real agency, credible safeguards, and demonstrable public value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14203461
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Perceptions of Personal Data Spaces for Citizen-Centered Health Data Governance in Belgium: Cross-Sectional Survey

Erik Laes, Jochem van Noord, Karin Hannes, Nathalie Lambrechts et al.
Healthcare
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Public Perceptions of Personal Data Spaces for Citizen-Centered Health Data Governance in Belgium: Cross-Sectional Survey

Erik Laes, Jochem van Noord, Karin Hannes, Nathalie Lambrechts, Cato van Schyndel
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Personal Data Spaces (PDSs) are promoted as infrastructures that strengthen citizen participation in health data governance through transparency and individual control. However, empirical evidence on citizens’ views of PDSs remains limited. This study examined how citizens evaluate We Are, a proposed citizen-centered PDS model in Flanders, Belgium, including overall support, preferences for control and transparency, acceptance of different data types and uses, and factors associated with support. Methods: An online survey was conducted among 1041 adults aged 18–79 years in Flanders using quotas for gender, age, education, province, and urbanization. Participants evaluated the We Are model and completed measures concerning reasons for support, control and transparency, storage of medical and lifestyle data, and data sharing across purposes and recipient types. Data were analyzed using t-tests, linear regression, and mixed models with repeated measures. Results: We Are evaluations were ambivalent but slightly positive (M = 2.51 on a 1–4 scale) and did not differ significantly from the scale midpoint. Sociodemographic characteristics explained little variance in support (R2 = 0.033), whereas adding understanding and psychographic factors increased variance to R2 = 0.238. Respondents valued control more than transparency and were more willing to store medical than lifestyle data (Δ = 0.380, p < 0.001). Willingness to share data was higher for both personal and public non-commercial uses than for public commercial uses, whereas personal commercial uses were rated lower. Private recipients were associated with lower willingness to share than public recipients. Conclusions: Support for PDSs was conditional and related more strongly to understanding and psychographic factors than to sociodemographic characteristics. These findings indicate that PDSs should be embedded in governance arrangements that provide real agency, credible safeguards, and demonstrable public value.

HealthcareVol. 14(20)
Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Vlaamse Overheid
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.