Differences in Dust Emission and Near‐Surface Transport Patterns Among Three Surface Substrate Types

ABSTRACT Soil wind erosion is a major driver of atmospheric dust emissions and land degradation. Many studies have examined dust release from different substrates, but differences in methods and units still limit quantitative understanding of how surface conditions and wind jointly control dust emission and near‐surface transport. A closed‐circuit wind tunnel was used to compare dust emission and vertical transport from dune sand (sand, D 50 = 176 μm), farmland soil (sandy loam, D 50 = 86 μm), and dry lakebed sediments (sand, D 50 = 153 μm). At 14 m s −1 , farmlands transported 6.2–7.2 times more PM 2.5 and 7.1–8.3 times more PM 10 than the other two substrates ( p < 0.001), while dunes and lakebeds transported more total mass. In the emitted material, dunes contributed the lowest fine particle proportion (PM 63 < 6.6%), farmlands maintained high fine fractions (PM 63 up to 55.5%), and lakebeds produced fine‐rich emissions at low wind speed but shifted towards low fine fractions as speed increased. Vertically, fine‐particle proportions increased with height over farmland soil across all wind speeds. Under the strongest wind, dune sand and dry lakebed sediment showed declining transported‐mass profiles and no significant height trends in particle‐size proportions. These results show that the surfaces that dominate total mass are not the same as those that dominate health‐relevant PM. This unified comparative analysis, grounded in controlled wind‐tunnel observations, supports targeted mitigation through modest‐height windbreaks for fine‐dust control on farmland, surface‐roughness enhancement on dunes, and crust stabilization on dry lakebeds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70925
Primary Topic
Aeolian processes and effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Dust Emission and Near‐Surface Transport Patterns Among Three Surface Substrate Types

Minghu Liu, Lu Zong, Jinlei Zhu, Chaoqun Ba et al.
Land Degradation and Development
Aeolian processes and effects
article

Differences in Dust Emission and Near‐Surface Transport Patterns Among Three Surface Substrate Types

Minghu Liu, Lu Zong, Jinlei Zhu, Chaoqun Ba, Ruochen Jia, Fang Liu, Zhimin Liu, Wennong Kuang, Zhiming Xin, Yuting Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Soil wind erosion is a major driver of atmospheric dust emissions and land degradation. Many studies have examined dust release from different substrates, but differences in methods and units still limit quantitative understanding of how surface conditions and wind jointly control dust emission and near‐surface transport. A closed‐circuit wind tunnel was used to compare dust emission and vertical transport from dune sand (sand, D 50 = 176 μm), farmland soil (sandy loam, D 50 = 86 μm), and dry lakebed sediments (sand, D 50 = 153 μm). At 14 m s −1 , farmlands transported 6.2–7.2 times more PM 2.5 and 7.1–8.3 times more PM 10 than the other two substrates ( p < 0.001), while dunes and lakebeds transported more total mass. In the emitted material, dunes contributed the lowest fine particle proportion (PM 63 < 6.6%), farmlands maintained high fine fractions (PM 63 up to 55.5%), and lakebeds produced fine‐rich emissions at low wind speed but shifted towards low fine fractions as speed increased. Vertically, fine‐particle proportions increased with height over farmland soil across all wind speeds. Under the strongest wind, dune sand and dry lakebed sediment showed declining transported‐mass profiles and no significant height trends in particle‐size proportions. These results show that the surfaces that dominate total mass are not the same as those that dominate health‐relevant PM. This unified comparative analysis, grounded in controlled wind‐tunnel observations, supports targeted mitigation through modest‐height windbreaks for fine‐dust control on farmland, surface‐roughness enhancement on dunes, and crust stabilization on dry lakebeds.

Land Degradation and Development
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beijing Forestry University (CN), Institute of Applied Ecology (CN), Wuhan Botanical Garden (CN), Chinese Academy of Forestry (CN), Desert Forestry Experimental Center (CN), Institute of Desertification Studies (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hebei Minzu Normal University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia, Chinese Academy of Forestry
Climate action, Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Aeolian processes and effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.