Who Oversees the Systems That Oversee Us?

Paper 1 of 2 in the AI Governance & Accountability Dossier. As AI shapes decisions about benefits, work, housing, credit, education and information, this paper asks who can inspect a system, challenge its use, and require a remedy. It reviews the 2025-26 U.S. governance landscape, including the GAO requirement count, OMB M-25-21 and M-25-22, Executive Order 14365 and state activity, and separates rules from remedies. It proposes a six-question diagnostic (authority, responsibility, evidence, visibility, challenge, remedy), a Minimum Accountability Package that works without a new office, and a comparison of three institutional models, including an elected state-level commissioner with independent technical staff. It treats the human-factors evidence as narrow, states what would change its conclusions, and labels every material claim in a ledger as documented, reported, interpretation or hypothesis. Not peer reviewed. Not legal advice. Research cut-off October 14, 2026.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23384211
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Oversees the Systems That Oversee Us?

Robert A. Johnson
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Who Oversees the Systems That Oversee Us?

Robert A. Johnson
article en

Abstract

Paper 1 of 2 in the AI Governance & Accountability Dossier. As AI shapes decisions about benefits, work, housing, credit, education and information, this paper asks who can inspect a system, challenge its use, and require a remedy. It reviews the 2025-26 U.S. governance landscape, including the GAO requirement count, OMB M-25-21 and M-25-22, Executive Order 14365 and state activity, and separates rules from remedies. It proposes a six-question diagnostic (authority, responsibility, evidence, visibility, challenge, remedy), a Minimum Accountability Package that works without a new office, and a comparison of three institutional models, including an elected state-level commissioner with independent technical staff. It treats the human-factors evidence as narrow, states what would change its conclusions, and labels every material claim in a ledger as documented, reported, interpretation or hypothesis. Not peer reviewed. Not legal advice. Research cut-off October 14, 2026.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.